you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ReeferMadness 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You had a 50/50 and got it wrong.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

daymn. OK. so you are debating honestly and not just making it up as you go along to win.

As i'm trying to understand what you are saying, are you suggesting that the proposed 'public trials' would involve free and fair representation, debate that is not constantly derailed and interrupted by ameliamaniac and does not involve some kind of voting at the end?

Because that's not what would happen, but i don't want to ascribe that vision to your voice if i've misunderstood that as well