you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fred_red_beans 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I'm sorry, but it is you who don't understand science and are spreading disinformation.

There is no science in support of masks and lockdowns reducing the spread of a virus.

More people die from smoking even with the inflated PCR data.

[–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

mr fred_red_beans,

if you just accept that they have one goal and that is to genocide the majority of the human species, i think that you will find it much easier to understand their intentions.

people are dying horrible deaths from the vaccinations.

i watched a video today about a lady that has convulsions all day and all night because of her "jab".. and she was a healthy and hot female prior to getting stuck.

i warn you to not take the vaccine, it will kill you.

masks do absolutely nothing, except they allow you to blend it more at the grocery store, you will attract less attention to yourself and your family.

[–]fred_red_beans 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

No way in hell I'm putting mRNA in my body and becoming a GMO

I think fertility rates are about to go down

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

WTF? Read the news and reports. It's easy to find the scientific studies of the benefits of masks. You're merely parroting idiotic opinions at Fox or and anti-vax site. And what is this 'spreading of disinformation' if 99% of the world is appropriately informed of the scientific benefits of wearing masks, but /u/fred_red_beans on Saidit obviously knows something they don't. The facts are right in front of you if you want to look for them.

[–]fred_red_beans 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I see, science to you means whatever the mob says it is.

You are the most disingenuous user on saidit.

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And new too

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What do you consider a mob approach to science? Can you imagine scientists forming a mob?

How do you define disingenuous, with regardo to my posts? Do I not seem genuine? Do you think I bothered to reply to you because I wanted to give the opinion of someone else?

If you want to think about your arguments, let's hear what you have to say.

There is not a 'mob' of scientists, or a 'mob' of those who support the scientists.

And if you wonder if my approaches are genuine, read my posts.