you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fschmidt 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/77i5/saidit_will_die_like_voat_an_incel_vouching_for/raqq

What about this? He did not advocate violence.

Just because I would like to wipe out about 90% of humanity doesn't mean that I advocate that anyone do this or that I actually intend to do it. Such distinctions are important.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

I already settled the matter in that comment.

  1. I didn't ban him, Magnora did

  2. The listed reason was for advocating violence and sexualizing minors

  3. I have evidence that he did both of these, stop pretending he didn't

[–]Node 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

advocating: to speak or write in favor of; support or urge by argument; recommend publicly:

Hmm. IMO, he's technically just saying what his belief is rather than than actually advocating. Despite using the word support instead of belief, he's not presenting an argument in that comment for others to adopt his beliefs. While that is a technical point, he doesn't appear to have technically crossed the line. But saying "mass murder" instead of "legally executed" was probably too much of a stroll beside the line for M7.

As for the bit about "all girls above 11-12," banning might not be enough. While it might just be internet hyperbole, it makes you wonder if he has access to any in real life.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

he's technically just saying what his belief is rather than than actually advocating.

That's still against the rules. I don't really agree with it, since it should be calls to violence, but it's the rule Magnora and d3rr made. People seem to think I have more power than I do.

But saying "mass murder" instead of "legally executed" was probably too much of a stroll beside the line for M7.

Mhm, the specific language is also pretty important to him.

As for the bit about "all girls above 11-12," banning might not be enough.

Mhm.

it makes you wonder if he has access to any in real life.

He said he was already in a relationship with a teenager, and that he was telling her he was only nineteen — which is not only illegal, but down-right evil.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

People seem to think I have more power than I do.

In the context of saidit, you're one of the most powerful people on the site! ᕦ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) ᕤ

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

In the context of saidit, you're one of the most powerful people on the site!

Yeah, but I'm not that powerful; I can't change the rules, just how I enforce them.

[–]Node 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You know, this is a good meta post on how things are going, albeit with you specifically. Might be nice to have a periodic "saidit update" post (every 1 to 3 months?) to say what's been happening, # of spammers banned, technical issues solved or cropping up, and etc.

Would give people a central discussion place to help integrate users into the community more, and/or for people to express concerns over a problem, or whatever.

o/

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You know, this is a good meta post on how things are going, albeit with you specifically.

Oh, thanks.

Might be nice to have a periodic "saidit update" post (every 1 to 3 months?) to say what's been happening

Yeah, that'd be nice.

Would give people a central discussion place to help integrate users into the community more, and/or for people to express concerns over a problem, or whatever.

Mhm

[–]specialsauces 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

few people really understand that the current administration's agenda is to genocide approx 90% of humanity.

90% of humanity must go, and the current administration understands this.. they would prefer to use soft weapons, such as starvation, which leave less of a footprint on the earth, compared to nuclear weapons.

our current resources simply will not support ten billion people, nine billion people gotta go.

we have one small can of tuna and twenty people to feed, it aint gonna play out well.

eighteen of you gotta go.

[–]fschmidt 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In my case it is much simpler. I just hate 90% of humanity because they are evil morons. Religion used to civilize average people somewhat, but religion is dying, so humanity is becoming scum.