you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuff 10 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 2 fun -  (24 children)

Sure. Magnora7 took several of the subs I mod and blocked them from the s/new feed. He also went into our settings and unblocked a user that had been trolling our subverse. He did this without notifying us or even giving warning that we were violating the pyramid of debate (which we weren't). I have screen shots and proof on all this if anyone thinks I'm making it up.

The subverses in question

s/altrightwebm

s/debatealtright

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]

    [–]SaidOverRed 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    It looks like the altrightwebm (from a quick scan of the rules) does remove posts that are high on the pyramid of debate because those are supposed to go on the debateAltRight area, which appears fine except I do not understand the point of the third rule. If that disallows hypotheticals, then I find that troublesome. If it is of no consequence to those who simply blindly post, but do not lie, then I guess it's okay.

    [–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I don't know about your "violations", regardless more communication is critical in these matters. Not his strongest suit.

    [–]AddledCorpse 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

    Wait is this why i literally never see debate alt right in the front page despite being subscribed?

    I thought it was just dead

    [–][deleted]  (14 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]bobbobbybob 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      having the vile hateful garbage that debatealtright spews out shown on the front page, isn't good for attracting new users.

      lol, whatever, loser

      Doesn't mean they can't exist though.

      How fucking magnanimous of you. User for 1 month

      I'm constantly impressed by the sheer level of hubris that drive retarded leftists

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        jesus fucking wept.

        That kind of condescending speech might have served you well elsewhere, but here it just gets a swift "fuck off".

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          Ah, another new 'expert', not shy to tell us how our own site works.

          This site is about discourse, debate and.... free speech, so go fuck yourself, you condescending twat.

          If you like I can add a paragraph of philosophical musings to drag this up the pyramid of debate, but personally, I like rolling around in the muck when it comes to a bit of mudslinging with leftist retards.

          [–]send_nasty_stuff 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

          So you fully admit that the admin of the site blocks certain subverses from being seen by saidit users? Also you're cool with a social media admin driving the site in a direction that is not organic and not reflective of a good chunk of the actual user base? You do realize that if he's going to do that during the early years of the site he certainly going to do it in the later years and there's a good chance that a community you mod or enjoy will be targeted for the silent treatment as well.

          [–]EuropeanAwakening 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

          Why is it vile and hateful for Europeans to advocate for their interests?

          Because you're an anti White. It's really that simple. You do not attack any other group the way you attack White people. This makes your agenda obvious.

          [–][deleted]  (5 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]Dragonerne 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

            You don't have to say that you're anti white. We can smell it from a mile away. It's not racist to assume immigration is part of a sheme in the genocide of whites. How is it racist? Literally doesn't make any sense. Whites are allowed to have their own countries even if jews like yourself want our countries destroyed. It's extremely racist to suggest whites don't have a right to their own countries lol.

            [–][deleted]  (3 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

              The far simpler explanation is people seeking out better lives for themselves.

              It's politically organised and it's against the wishes of the majority of the people. So no, it's not just a simple explanation, although it would be nice if the world was just simple.

              Who is saying white people don't have the right to exist?

              You said that it's vile, hateful and racist to assume immigration is making a race go extinct.
              Whites saying we don't want nonwhites in our countries is us exercising our right to our own countries. You have a problem with our self-determination and wish to eradicate us through forceful immigration of non-whites against the majority of whites wishes.

              Also do you alt righters have an alert system or something?

              I'm not alt right. I am left wing social democratic. You assuming i'm alt right because I proclaim that whites deserve a right to self determination and a right to their own countries is very telling of your entire "totally not wanting white countries to get destroyed"-world view. You probably support BLM too. Hard to be more mask off for you at this point and you're not hiding it very well.

              Please positively confirm:
              "Whites have a right to their own countries"
              "Whites deserve self-determination in their own countries"
              "Whites deserve their own countries like everyone else"
              "Whites have a right to refuse non-white immigration into their own countries"
              "Mass Immigration can be used to genocide a people in an area"

              If you disagree with one or more of them, then just say that you disagree with those.

              [–][deleted]  (1 child)

              [deleted]

                [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                No idea where you are, but I did a quick search and in Britain a recent immigration poll found Britain to be moderately high in anti-immigration,

                44% want it reduced. How many of those asked were native white british people?

                Nobody wants to eradicate you, how about you marry and have children?

                Even if I had 100 kids, the result would be the same.

                Most of us accept the fact that race has been twisted and pushed as an issue specifically to divide workers, a point I feel like you may have missed?

                No, I see it as yet another argument as to why homogeneity is better. In fact that's one of the reasons why they're pushing immigration.

                and I do in fact think black lives matter, although I disagree with the organization itself

                Well, then we seem to agree on that point.

                This is trumped by people already living/being born there having a right to exist

                No it's not. It is not a human right for turks to settle in France or for Somalis to settle in Sweden.

                Why does the existence of a non-white in your country threaten self-determination?

                Because we live in democracies.

                Why do you believe countries are defined more by race, rather than culture, industry, environment, etc.?

                It's one aspect. I personally don't care about race. But I'm forced to care because someone has the intention to destroy and genocide my own race.

                Go found an ethnostate somewhere else where the majority agree?

                No, thanks. We already have ethnostates in all of Europe. I don't need to found anything, because my forefathers already did. I just need to defend whats ours.

                How does this work?

                It's a strategy that's been used throughout history.

                [–]send_nasty_stuff 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                Wait is this why i literally never see debate alt right in the front page despite being subscribed?

                Yes.

                I thought it was just dead

                Nope. Very much alive and also on ruqqus.

                https://ruqqus.com/+DebateTheDissidentRight

                [–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                I am wary of censorship, so I subbed and then opened a saidit.net tab. I have debatealtright showing up (down a page and a half), specifically: https://saidit.net/s/debatealtright/comments/6k54/technology_and_liberalism/ 3 hours ago

                Care to post an image of your front page u/AddledCorpse ? Maybe 3 pages down for us?

                [–]send_nasty_stuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                It works for your own homepage but not in the general s/all or s/new.

                [–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Isn't that expected based of saidit's FAQ? Like, the people who want that are still getting access. Maybe I'm missing something. Oh, you're saying it's de facto quarantined.

                Well, getting clarification on this would be nice, but first step is to get clarity on which subs are echo chamber subs (ie women only, alt right only, antifa only, etc) and which allow free discussion (like, apparently, the dissident sub discussed): https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/6esq/pyramid_of_debate_vs_echo_chamber_subs/