The same people who say we need to "stop with the anti-semitism" are the same ones who will support anti-White rhetoric as free speech

submitted by EuropeanAwakening from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 22 insightful - 4 fun22 insightful - 3 fun23 insightful - 4 fun -  (8 children)

Democracy means the citizens have some ability to discuss and influence policy in their communities.

There is a 100 year old plan (Kalgeri Plan) to reduce the homogeneity of Europe and dissolve Western nations.

The Kalergi in his own words:

"(European) man of the future will be mixed races. Today's races and classes will disappear due to the disappearance of space (nations) and time."The Pan-European plan of Kalergi envisaged the use of violent and disproportionate mass immigration, especially from non-European countries, in order to bring about a common European state dictatorship and the destruction of the indigenous white population - the nationalities of Europe.

Do people disagree that the demographics in Europe are rapidly changing?

Is it antisemitic to discuss the history of this plan, and the factors that continue to drive this change? Wikipedia indicates that it is, but we know who's controlling that propaganda operation... (Zionists Manipulating Internet And Wikipedia - some will find this shocking).

Is it antisemitic to show a local Israeli news station promoting a Wikipedia editing workshop?

Should citizens in European "democracies" be allowed to discuss factual history, and the resulting impact on current events?

Are "Democratic" societies no longer allowed the right to self-determination of their own communities?

In my opinion topics like this should be eligible for debate; without ad homenim attacks.

Censorship and ignorance is a weapon against the average person.

The average person is being intellectually disarmed.

[–]sudd3nclar1ty 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Like I said, do you. The count's scheme sounds...convoluted. I'm not even sure what I just read, that shit was muddy AF.

As the poster on the Reddit thread remarked, if you are against immigration, then be against immigration. It doesn't have to be a mustache-twirling plot hatched by counts and Zionists.

There are many good, realistic reasons to be against immigration, neoliberalism, genocide and organized religion. Shit I can support any one of those arguments with concrete reasons that have nothing to do with racist conspiracies.

It's tough to be taken seriously unless you accurately define problems and propose related solutions. Otherwise, this is just boring speculation and hate opinion disguised as pseudo-science.

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 4 fun13 insightful - 5 fun -  (6 children)

What does mass immigration have to do with the Syrian civil war? I guess you'll never find out.

[–]sudd3nclar1ty 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Neoliberal chickens coming home to roost? A little dash of drought and climate catastrophe. Proxy war between Russia and the west. Cruel leadership and human rights violations by elites.

If I was unlucky enough to be born in Syria I'd GTFO too. That place is a political shitshow. If western democracies were smart, they'd stabilize these regions so desperate people don't wash up on their shores. Instead we sell arms, invade their neighbors and let allies like Turkey crush the Kurds.

People aren't plants. They can move to safer places. Just wait til the climate really starts heating up and the real fun starts.

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 4 fun10 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Yes. So you see the mass immigration issue is much deeper and more multifaceted than being for or against it. What people are reacting to is a new phenomena that came directly from western involvement in Syria.

[–]bobbobbybob 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

but why are western nations in Syria?

What race of people, embedded in governments worldwide, started those wars?

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Israel trying to conquer the surrounding region and using the US military as the tool to accomplish that? Same reason the US invaded Iraq, Kuwait, and many others in the region.

Now there's a mass exodus created by that war.

[–]Chipit 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Syria was destroyed because it was a threat to Israel. It was also a conduit for supplies to Hezbollah.

Most of US Middle East policy is to the benefit of Israel and the detriment of everyone else, including America.

[–]sudd3nclar1ty 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can't argue with this. Israel has been wagging the dog for a long time.