The same people who say we need to "stop with the anti-semitism" are the same ones who will support anti-White rhetoric as free speech

submitted by EuropeanAwakening from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Sand313man 33 insightful - 5 fun33 insightful - 4 fun34 insightful - 5 fun -  (30 children)

You’re not my opponents you dumb fuck. I’m for free speech. I’m for open discussion. But I’m also for embarrassing idiots. Thinking just because there is free speech here you can say anything you want and not be called out on your fucking lunacy.

Also the right isn’t as fragile as the left or as deluded. Unfortunately some of you here are dense as shit. As such, you need to be brought back to reality from time to time.

[–][deleted] 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (28 children)

you just also called him dumb fuck, off to call an ally that, one who is not an opponent.

[–]Sand313man 17 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 3 fun18 insightful - 4 fun -  (27 children)

Maybe I’m not his ally... he is dumb as shit clearly...

If you want to see where I stand on issue here’s my reddit sub: https://www.reddit.com/r/DoubleSpeak1984/

Knock yourself out.

But I’m not exactly going to befriend the dumbest people in the room.

[–]The_Ded 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (22 children)

"Constantly ushering constant attacks on one group of people" is a problem, you say? How come all the top posts on your little plebbit page only concern the niggers and the BLM movement, then? So, disliking blacks is fine, but disliking jews is crossing the line? How does being a shabbes goy feel?

[–]Sand313man 13 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 2 fun -  (21 children)

I don’t dislike blacks. BLM has funding from CAIR and all contributions go to democrats. Most go to the pocket of Biden and Bernie.

BLM is a front.

Big fan of people like Candace Owens and Terry crews for example.

PlentY of black People oppose the BLM movement.

BLM has nothing to do with black lives actually mattering when most blacks are killed due to black on black violence. Reducing police leads to more black on black crime for great members of the community who are black.

But nice try, idiot.

You would think you already knew that? And you’re just trying to virtue signal like the left...

So familiar.

[–]bobbobbybob 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

you are SO CLOSE to understanding. There's a final layer of 'backing', and it is an international cabal.

Not ALL jews are part of it, but those that are a part of it are ALL jews

[–]FediNetizen 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (18 children)

Candace Owens

When I watched her JRE special and watched her spend 20 minutes denying that most scientists agree with the notion that humans are the primary cause of climate change despite being presented with study after study showing they do, I saw right through her shit. She's not an "independent thinker", she's just another conservative pundit.

Same shit with her terrible COVID-19 takes (claiming the 100k-240k death projections were bullshit, when they turned out to be quite accurate), bragging about taking small needless trips and not wearing a mask, and her bringing up the fact that George Floyd had a criminal record, as if that in any way mitigated the fact that he was asphyxiated by a cop. That woman is a snake.

Edit: And we can add this shit. Outright lying about COVID-19 stats. The virus has already killed a quarter of a percent of NYC residents, over six times her claimed 0.04% fatality rate. Plenty of other areas with have similar numbers.

[–]bobbobbybob 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

yeah, CO2 doesn't control climate, and the recent lock down proves it. Human activity world wide ground to a halt, but the CO2 levels as measured in hawaii continued their change as they have been for decades.

We could get deep into the 'science' - I'm fully equipped to go there, if you want to. I can debunk 100% of climate papers, even the deeply mathematical and pretending-to-be-valid-physics ones. Just like thousands of experts in their fields can do with the bullshit make believe that the IPCC spews.

CO2 is unrelated to temperature.

high CO2 always precedes an ice age.

The ONLY uncontaminated metric of CO2's "heat trapping" is the rate of cooling after sunset, and that has demonstrably increased as CO2 increases.

Gasses cannot exhibit blackbody or greybody radiation, radiation in the atmosphere cannot be fully modelled with a particle model (even Planck says this: "we need to use a wave model to fully undertand"). Specifically there are coherency and resonance aspects that are ignored by IPCC scientists.

its BS.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Gasses cannot exhibit blackbody or greybody radiation.

This is a 100% fact.

For an object to emit a continuous spectrum it must exist in a form which contain a lattice structure (solid, liquid).

This is proof that the sun's surface contains a lattice structure.

The sun is not a ball of gas.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I can't comment on the sun. I get the feeling it is a bubble, like everything else, and some serious extreme physics plasma fuckery is going on in the gravitational hell of the centre of the shell.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Does the sun have a surface? Transverse waves, Helioseismology, CMEs, X-Rays and Flares!

[–]FediNetizen 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

...and the recent lock down proves it. Human activity world wide ground to a halt, but the CO2 levels as measured in hawaii continued their change as they have been for decades.

Oh jesus, you really should have at least tried to look up the numbers before coming up with this drivel.

Mauna Loa data is representative of the global average. We had some reductions in emissions in some parts of the globe, but globally most of the rest of our typical production continued as normal. This article, from actual scientists, estimates a 17% reduction compared to last years levels. A temporary dip of 17% isn't going to reverse the trend of rising levels of CO2, just slow it down a bit. That you think we should have seen some drastic change in recorded levels at Mauna Loa shows how far your understanding of the actual science and actual numbers is from reality.

We could get deep into the 'science' - I'm fully equipped to go there

No, no you are definitely not equipped to go there.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

so you quote an 'estimate', yet reject the data. Okay then.

Show me the data. not the models - the models are fucked. Data.

a 17% drop in emissions is not a 'small' drop, and absolutely should be visible in the 'global average' (actually, not an average at all, but a direct measurement of the air in hawaii, but whatever). It isn't. That's because human contributions to CO2 are miniscule, so significant changes in them MAKE NO DIFFERENCE.

But way to go failing to address anything else I said.

The absolute measure of CO2 proposed warming effect is the rate of cooling after sunset. Which is... Increasing. The opposite of the proposed effect, and utterly in line with expected effects if you are not a delusional 'climate' joke scientist.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

DUDE. You just made my friends' list. =D

[–]Tom_Bombadil 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

The virus has already killed a quarter of a percent of NYC residents, over six times her claimed 0.04% fatality rate.

Every death is being documented as a covid death if the person "tests positive" using the fraudulent "tests".

Here's the official National Vital Statistics Services April 2020 Guidance for Certifying Deaths Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19)

See paragraphs 5 & 6 where they provide coroners with the new reporting requirements.

This section on the death certificate is for reporting the sequence of conditions that led directly to death. The immediate cause of death, which is the disease or condition that directly preceded death and is not necessarily the underlying cause of death (UCOD), should be reported on line a. The conditions that led to the immediate cause of death should be reported in a logical sequence in terms of time and etiology below it.

The UCOD, which is “(a) the disease or injury which initiated the train of morbid events leading directly to death or (b) the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury” (7), should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I.

So... if a swimmer is eaten by a shark, and the arm that is recovered tests positive for covid; then put Coco19 on line 1, and shark attack on line 2...

It's a hoax.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

So... if a swimmer is eaten by a shark, and the arm that is recovered tests positive for covid; then put Coco19 on line 1, and shark attack on line 2... No you're just not understanding what you're reading. At all. They even give multiple of how it's supposed to be written. The immediate causes listed in the examples are Acute respiratory distress syndrome, Acute respiratory acidosis, and acute respiratory illness, all of which mean they died because they couldn't fucking breathe.

COVID-19 is listed as the underlying cause, or one of the underlying causes, when it's determined that's what made it so that they couldn't fucking breathe. No, COVID-19 is not listed as the immediate cause of death, and it's certainly not going to be listed as the cause of death if you get eaten by a fucking shark. Try actually reading it next time.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Try actually reading it next time.

The direct quote from the document was included in the comment. Review the document yourself at the official CDC.gov site:

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvss/vsrg/vsrg03-508.pdf

It's explicitly states:

the circumstances of the accident or violence which produced the fatal injury” (7), should be reported on the lowest line used in Part I.

The shark attack is "the accident or violence" so it is now considered secondary. This reporting change was made in April.

Every Coco death since April is questionable, at best.

Here's a local news report from a Florida station.

Man Dies in Motorcycle Fatality but Listed as BS-19 Death

The reporting system for fatalities has worked quite well, for many decades.

If the pandemic was a real and deadly epidemic, then there would be no reason to modify the reporting method.

But they changed it in April, because people weren't dying from it.

It's a hoax.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The motorcycle death is a clerical error, not evidence of a hoax.

But sure, basically every developed country, including enemy countries, are colluding with each other to fake these cases and death numbers because wanting to shut down the economy makes so much sense.

[–]Sand313man 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Joe rogan is a fucking podcast. They talk about anything and everything. He got musk to fucking smoke weed for the love of god.

Candace Owens isn’t very knowledgeable on climate change anyways. And that’s not the topic of discussion here. That’s a separate complex issue, and it’s not nearly as simple and dry cut as you think. But sure Candace Owens arguements on that are terrible from both perspectives of the climate change debate. She just doesn’t really have a well read stance on that.

Candace Owens is however very well versed on the literature and history of black America. And on that topic she speaks accurately and with conviction.

[–]72ndGender 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

[–]FediNetizen 3 insightful - 0 fun - 6 hours ago* Candace Owens

When I watched her JRE special and watched her spend 20 minutes denying that most scientists agree with the notion that humans are the primary cause of climate change despite being presented with study after study showing they do, I saw right through her shit

Have you read this:

https://www.nationalreview.com/2015/10/climate-change-no-its-not-97-percent-consensus-ian-tuttle/

Complete game changer when it comes to that 97% statistic.

[–]GConly 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Reducing police leads to more black on black crime for great members of the community who are black.

This was done in some US city a few years ago that demanded lower policing levels to cut down racist arrests.

Black homicide rate shot up as a result.

We saw the same thing in the UK when we cut out stop and search on the grounds it was racist. Deaths of mainly young black men shot up from stabbings, and it had to come back.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

is that sub kind of like a conspiracy sub except the one rule is you may not discuss who is in the inner party of 1984

[–]Sand313man 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Every piece there is factual.

[–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you're using doublethink on yourself to make yourself not criticize jews, because you know if you do you will become an unperson. This is why you are insulting people in this thread, you're mad at yourself for being a hypocrite. It is painful to admit. It is hard for you to look at yourself in the mirror. Don't do this, daily stress will lead to health problems and a shortened lifespan. Take the red pill.

[–]Fitter_Happier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're taking ad hominem to 11. I'm convinced, r/youareverysmart.

[–]peety 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

<deleted>