you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Catbug 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Why do Family Courts favour giving mothers the child in the majority of cases?

Because of the assumption that women are inherently nurturing, know how to care for a baby, and want to raise children. The patriarchal idea of what a woman is.

Why do Family Courts favour awarding large amounts of alimony to the ex-wife in the vast majority of cases?

Old Fashioned idea stemming from women marrying and being a stay at home wife or mother provided for by a husband. She has no job history or training and no financial support if she leaves her husband. Needs reassessing as a policy.

Why are Police trained to always arrest the man in a domestic violence dispute, even if the woman is the only one displaying any violence, and even if the man is the accuser?

Because the vast majority of the time it is a man who’s the attacker and there’s been a few too many cases of police removing nobody and the victim being murdered.

Why has the pay gap been proven to be perfectly equal between genders in western countries when the same job is compared?

We devalue jobs once they are filled by a large number of women.

Why did 19 of the top 20 richest women in the world get their money from ex-husbands or an inheritance rather than earning it themselves through hard work?

Let’s not pretend all the richest dudes out there aren’t also Saudi princes who never earned a cent lol. That’s just a strawman.

[–]teelo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Because of the assumption that women are inherently nurturing, know how to care for a baby, and want to raise children. The patriarchal idea of what a woman is.

If women don't like that because its "sexist", then why do the vast majority of you still ask for full custody anyway?

Old Fashioned idea stemming from women marrying and being a stay at home wife or mother provided for by a husband. She has no job history or training and no financial support if she leaves her husband. Needs reassessing as a policy.

If she has no job history or training then that was her life choice. Women have equal rights, and equal responsibilities for their actions and inactions. Its still sexist and not the Patriarchy for courts to generally favour them in alimony payments.

Because the vast majority of the time it is a man who’s the attacker and there’s been a few too many cases of police removing nobody and the victim being murdered.

Got any proof that the man is usually the attacker? Or are you just making assumptions based on the Duluth Model?

Let’s not pretend all the richest dudes out there aren’t also Saudi princes who never earned a cent lol. That’s just a strawman.

Five of the top ten richest people are dudes who poured time and effort into building tech companies. Bezos, Gates, Zuckerberg...

[–]Catbug 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Are the majority of women asking for that? Where are your sources?

No, not the Duluth model. Bachman, Ronet; Linda E. Saltzman (August 1995). "Violence against Women: Estimates from the Redesigned Survey" (PDF). Bureau of Justice Statistics.

You can find more collected here. https://web.csulb.edu/~mfiebert/assault.htm

That was less her choice in the fifties or prior and that’s the era I’m talking about. It needs serious reassessment since women are now allowed financial independence and are not limited to certain careers. I’m sure Martha, born 1922 was just swamped with opportunities for total independence and never heard a lick of the socialisation of the time.

So? Zuck earned himself absurd amounts of money for selling peoples privacy. What a hero. Also such convincing proof that patriarchy doesn’t exist at all. Top tier.

[–]teelo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Are the majority of women asking for that? Where are your sources?

The courts wouldn't award custody to someone who doesn't ask for custody. Thats a basic legal principle. If the vast majority are being awarded custody then consequently the vast majority must also be asking for custody.

(August 1995)

Got anything that isn't 25 years old based on a time when we had our last wave of race riots?

So? Zuck earned himself absurd amounts of money for selling peoples privacy. What a hero. Also such convincing proof that patriarchy doesn’t exist at all. Top tier.

So? The majority of the top 20 richest women earned absurd amounts of money by lying on their back. What heroes. All this proves is women are lazy, men put in all the work so of course men get the rewards for it.

[–]Catbug 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

lol. The richest women didn’t work as hard as zuck so says you, therefore all women are inherently lazy. Great arguments.

[–]teelo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Great comeback. Haven't proven any of my points wrong.

[–]Catbug 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You haven’t made any points other than your opinions, which mean absolutely nothing to anyone but you.

[–]teelo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Radical feminism is nonsense. Women, especially white women, are far more privileged than men. Prove me wrong or your cause is pointless.

[–]Catbug 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Prove your own claim bruh.

[–]teelo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You're the one trying to push your cause onto everyone else. Prove to us that its worth listening to or stop pushing it and admit that you're pushing nonsense.