you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]america_first_1776 33 insightful - 10 fun33 insightful - 9 fun34 insightful - 10 fun -  (17 children)

Maybe you're just wrong.

[–]ech 42 insightful - 3 fun42 insightful - 2 fun43 insightful - 3 fun -  (16 children)

IME you do find men who can be convinced, and some of them have become my best friends. But I'm sympathetic to harsh moderation of feminist e-spaces, because it's a numbers game -- you get flooded by tons of men, most asserting the same tedious deflections. Maybe you convince 1 out of 20 -- you're still deluged by 19 shitposts that detract from the theme of your discussion. I'm brand new to this site and one of the biggest free speech zealots you'll meet, but it seems sensible to allow mods of niche subreddits to moderate in favor of their niche themes.

Also, the men I've been able to convince over the years, or with whom I've been able to find common ground, generally distinguish themselves as uncommonly bright and thoughtful from the start, even if they strongly disagree with me. They're not posting 110-IQ manosphere copypasta (which is most of what feminists need to moderate).

[–]america_first_1776 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (15 children)

See, you wrote two paragraphs and yet none of it shows that your side is correct. You didn't even give an example of a strawman "copypasta" from the "manosphere" (whatever the hell that means) that you think you can so easily disprove.

[–]ech 24 insightful - 4 fun24 insightful - 3 fun25 insightful - 4 fun -  (14 children)

If you don’t know what I’m talking about, you’re too obtuse (willfully or by no fault of your own) for me to want to engage.

[–]teelo 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (11 children)

If you refuse to provide evidence to back up your claims when requested then don't participate on a debate website.

[–]ech 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (9 children)

Is this a "debate website"? I thought it was an uncensored reddit alternative. "Debate website" sounds tedious, midwitted, and gay.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You might want to read the ToS.

[–]noice 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Look into the origins and intent of this website. It is literally meant as a debate website. There are other alternatives...

[–]ech 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Is there one that’s literally just an uncensored reddit without additional pretentions?

[–]noice 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think notabug.io

It is federated with this site, but with intent more along the lines of what you seek.

[–]ech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks

[–]Mallard 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You've signed up to somewhere you don't understand. Read the ToS. If you're not comfortable with debate, then this is not the place for you.

[–]ech 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I wouldn’t say I’m not “comfortable with debate,” but shoehorning every interaction into a high school debate paradigm is what people do who lack sufficient indicia IRL that they are smart, thus need to perform smart on the internet.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Here's your SaidIt gold: 🥇

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yes, this is a debate website. It isn't reddit, it isn't a safe space for GC weirdos to set up a bunker.

Follow the rules or....

fuck off.

Because we'll be reporting you a lot, until the admins get so pissed off they kick your entitled arses out.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

AF1's rejoinder to ech doesn't even make sense. If you want a debate you have to actually organize your thoughts AND respond to what the other person actually said.

[–]noice 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Don't agree =/= 'too obtuse'

[–]ech 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You’re right that these are distinct in many cases. Not sure they’re distinct here.