you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 29 insightful - 2 fun29 insightful - 1 fun30 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

from the modlog:

banned Popper (permanent: Dragging down discussion on Pyramid Of Debate: Rape Rhetoric "Women just want to be raped by a hot guy" type shit

Is this accurate? What post were you banned for?

[–][deleted] 13 insightful - 5 fun13 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

they were complaining how there sub was banned and a sub on reddit called rapekink wasn't. I tried to explain, that sub is all women who fantasize about being raped, and it is weird but it's true, and it's not really rape if the woman wants and allows it to happen cuz the guy is hot.

[–][deleted] 25 insightful - 2 fun25 insightful - 1 fun26 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

it's not really rape if

It does sound like you're doing that thing bad people do where they try to convincing people crime is "really ok" because <reason>.

It's still valid to criticize something like that, even if the sub is mostly women. There are people who have consented to being murdered and cannibalized, after all, but we can still convict people for killing those people. Perhaps it's what all men secretly desire to happen to themselves? Explains the "vore" stuff.

Ugk. I don't like engaging in this type of convo. Thanks for replying, but I think it's understandable that you were banned, it doesn't seem "morally bankrupt" to me. What do you think is "morally bankrupt" about what they did?

[–]holy_goat 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

you just took one PHRASE from his post out of context. wow. It's clearly not RAPE if both parties are consenting and participating in roleplay. which is that that is, it's rape roleplay.

And it's morally bankrupt because they are willfully misconstruing his argument, banning him, and putting a slanderous false quote up as the reason he was banned. Work on your personal issues instead of projecting them onto the behaviors of others.... or just go back to your vagina cult hugbox.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

it's not really rape if the woman wants and allows it to happen cuz the guy is hot

I don't think I'm misconstruing things here, rather it is you who is projecting. There is no consent described in this sentence that he is trying to argue is "not really rape". I know he also said things about women participating in the rapekink sub, but he also said the quoted text which doesn't really look ambiguous to me.

This is a common tactic with people who are trying to groom people around them in preparation for abusing others. "Oh kids actually like pedophilia," "Oh she actually liked it," etc.

And not to repeat myself from earlier, but vagina cults are amazing. And I and any other person can go wherever we please. You may be projecting with the need to work on personal issues, here.

The modlog looks accurate, not slanderous. He did indeed make an argument that women want to be raped by a hot guy.

[–]Wrang1er 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't rape non consensual?

[–][deleted] 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's still valid to criticize something like that, even if the sub is mostly women.

You can, but what would be the point? It's a fetish. People are not going to stop wanting what they want because other people think it's disgusting.