you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]fred_red_beans 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Labeling anyone who disagrees or is critical of you a shill is not an argument.

Do you honestly think all these users whom you are calling a shill are paid or receive other favortism/benefit to participate on saidit?

[–]jmichaelhudsondotnet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

"Labeling anyone who disagrees or is critical of you a shill is not an argument."

shill tactic - weaponized conflaction

nowhere have i said or done what you state here, "everyone who disagrees must be a shill" I never said that and you put those words in my mouth, which is some very manipulative garbage.

I do believe there are a ton of paid shills on saidit and every such site, it is a proven fact, and if you are unaware of this, you are basically about as savy to the internet as a toddler and should probably read a lot more and stfu until you have done so.

I checked back in after 3 weeks of posting and not one response to anything I wrote passed my "live human" test, fwiw. Not one. I basically have to instruct every commenter why their response is worthless garbage, and then wonder if everyone in the world is stupid, insane or being paid to act that way.

But at this point I do not spend much time wondering, read my 4 books and say something intelligent about them or get ouf of my face.

[–]fred_red_beans 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

By labeling others comments as "shill tactic", you are insinuating that you believe they are a shill. You have used the same verbiage is response to posts to your list of users above.

As we're here on pyramid practice, I'll help you out with the pyramid of debate: https://saidit.net/static/debatepyramid.jpg

What you are doing is ad hominem or name calling.

not one response to anything I wrote passed my "live human" test, fwiw. Not one.

So the users on Saidit are not only shills, but bots as well?

No one is interested in your reasons why you think their response is worthless garbage. If you think their response is so, just don't respond. Or post an actual argument, rather than just saying "shill tactic, shill tactic!".

read my 4 books and say something intelligent about them or get ouf of my face

Really? Grow up.

[–]jmichaelhudsondotnet 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

a shill tactic strongly implies shilling, you seem to think this is somehow illogical thinking

lol

shill tactics, continued, more of same - make all discussion personal, redirected back on the actual human being trying to make a point

that is all you are doing, and it is obvious to anyone with a brain not getting paid to be an asshat.

Also,

shill tactic - conflation, you try to put the words in my mouth that I say all users on saidit are shills when I do not say that, I only point out in case after case after case that obvious shill tactics are being used

and since shill tactics are all mechanical, and shills coordinate their responses with automated softwares, and since the summary effect of their work is to drive away actual humans, and ai does exist to create automated nonsensical responses

yes, a human taking part in that is already one full step into the being a robot themselves, or a drone, working against their own genetics for the interest of some borg-like entity.

Or I can just call you what you are, after investigation and a real attempt to communicate, which is you are a cunty douchebag.

Of course, this is not the same as just calling you a cunty douchebag, this is the summary of numerous points and analysis, which is self-evident to any actual human reader.