The rules on "Also no sexualization of children." are unclear. We know r/pedophilia was banned, and we know at least one user disagreed that the ban was just.

submitted by basedaf1 from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]basedaf1[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If this is a deal-breaker for you, I strongly encourage you to look at your own values and why you think this is important to focus on and post about, instead of the million other things you could've posted about instead.

I'm trying to work with you, not against you.

Therefore sexualizing 15 year olds is against our rules.

Therefore 16 is ok? You want the rules to be no talking about under 16's in a sexual light, and also believe the current rules as written don't count as a hidden content policy? Many incels promote sexual strategy concerning age of consent, which can be lower than 16 in countries outside the US. Thank you for telling me what should and shouldn't be of interest to me. I'll take that into consideration.

We cannot have a site outing high-level pedophiles, while simultaneously allowing public sexualization of children on the site.

Ok why? That's like saying you can't allow feminists on this site now that incels arrived. I have no problem sharing a site with feminists if you were wondering.