Saidit.net - 6/4/2018 - New terms of service updates, ban on vendors (self.SaidIt)

submitted by magnora7

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfunny
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 2 funny2 insightful - 1 funny3 insightful - 2 funny -  (14 children)

its not breaking the law, they violate the law.

That's what we thought for a while, which is why we allowed it in the first place. But it turns out that's not true. Just like if illegal porn is on the site, we the admins are held responsible from a legal perspective.

It sucks, but it's why we have to make this change. It's either that or saidit gets put at serious risk as the future approaches.

[–]Broken-needles350 5 insightful - 1 funny5 insightful - 0 funny6 insightful - 1 funny -  (11 children)

No, it is true. Just like porn, its not illegal unless there's underage junk in it. How can they call porn illegal? There's porno sites all over the web lol. These days, the Word is just a meaningless label for mudducks to abuse. Just like racism, fake news. Things are just labeled cause they don't want you to do something.

[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 1 funny3 insightful - 0 funny4 insightful - 1 funny -  (10 children)

I agree 100%. But I still don't want saidit to be shut down and taken away.

[–]Broken-needles350 3 insightful - 2 funny3 insightful - 1 funny4 insightful - 2 funny -  (9 children)

same, but that doesnt mean you should bend over to blue isis, lol

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 funny2 insightful - 0 funny3 insightful - 1 funny -  (8 children)

If it were just a potential risk that'd be one thing, but the more I research it it seems like an inevitability we'd get shut down, especially if that's the site's core userbase.

[–]Broken-needles350 2 insightful - 1 funny2 insightful - 0 funny3 insightful - 1 funny -  (7 children)

saidit is still young yet, who's to say GM will still be the core userbase as the site grows and expands.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 funny1 insightful - 0 funny2 insightful - 1 funny -  (6 children)

That was increasingly the direction things were moving given the numbers, but you're right.

[–]Broken-needles350 3 insightful - 2 funny3 insightful - 1 funny4 insightful - 2 funny -  (5 children)

mmm, not rly, your counting over a small period of time. this ban will be essentially the death of saidit, right now, the ban is the equivalent of chopping your head, legs, and arms off, lol.

rethink the ban, or atleast delay it

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 2 funny2 insightful - 1 funny3 insightful - 2 funny -  (4 children)

We rethought the ban for the last 2 weeks. I don't think you realize how much thought has been put in to this decision and how hard it was to make.

You realize all these greymarket people are here only because their previous website domesticrcs.com got raided by the FBI, right? And that that's now the top search term leading to saidit? I'm not just spinning yarns here, there are serious reasons we had to make this change.

[–]thehatter421 2 insightful - 1 funny2 insightful - 0 funny3 insightful - 1 funny -  (0 children)

I heard it was the FDA , big difference

[–]Broken-needles350 1 insightful - 1 funny1 insightful - 0 funny2 insightful - 1 funny -  (2 children)

https://www.ecosia.org/search?q=saidit.net

google.com saidit

its in the top, but not the very top, ecosia is my main search engine with waterfox on arch linux, lol.

mmm, no, cause i dont usually follow greymarket news, lol. maybe so, but the community wasnt involved, you dropped the big ball, now good opers are rushing off cause of the 5 days they have to find or create something new, cause nobody is willing to defend, lol.

there is too much fear. when the people fear the establishment, things are very bad. the establishment should fear us, lol.

idk the domesticrcs site, but always remember, innocent until proven guilty or otherwise :)

[–]DikDikDimbuss 1 insightful - 1 funny1 insightful - 0 funny2 insightful - 1 funny -  (1 child)

Are you talking about FOSTA? A law that hasn’t been signed yet? The real question is why not a single website on the internet isn’t opposed to this law and is already adhering to it even though the president has yet to sign it.

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 funny1 insightful - 0 funny2 insightful - 1 funny -  (0 children)

No the rules holding admins responsible for illegal porn (and other content on what should be a black-box service) have been around for 5+ years at least.