SaidIt submissions are now mirrored in near-realtime to notabug, with comment support coming soon. Thanks to magnora7 for the idea

submitted by go1dfish from notabug.io

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]go1dfish[S] 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (9 children)

Yep working hard to get federation support ready for a nab-server 1.0 release which will allow for real-time mirroring of nab here on a sub domain.

Thanks for the idea and for being open to such a collaboration. Strength through numbers.

[–]magnora7[A] 6 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Indeed, this is what real-world federation looks like imo

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

We may perish but our shit posts live forever!

[–][deleted]  (6 children)

[deleted]

    [–]go1dfish[S] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    Well it could be possible for me to make my tabulator aware of saidit votes, but keeping them updated would be quite difficult and it would be a weird fit given the differences in voting.

    Also when saidit is running a nab peer those votes will flow both ways.

    [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    I think you could just use the "points" score (shown in the top-right of every comments page) which projects the 2-dimensional voting system down to 1 dimension, where insightful is just +2 and fun is +1. So you could just use that score in place of a voting score. And I think just updating it once, a day or two after the thread has been created, would be enough to get a ballpark value.

    [–]go1dfish[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Hmm that could make sense, this is "score" in the API I assume?

    [–]magnora7 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Ah yes here, if you load a link like this:

    https://saidit.net/api/info.json?id=t5_1pj0

    You'll see:

    "score": 16,

    That's the value we want. Also 

    "ups": 16,

    is also valid to use, it's always identical to "score" on saidit. Whichever is easier for you.

    [–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yeah I think it's going to work like part 1 is just getting the post over with the sub it's from. That's complete.

    Part 2 is getting comments copied in to the threads from the saidit threads.

    Part 3 is probably going to be getting the link vote amounts copied over.

    Then part 4 will probably be replicating all that software on saidit, to mirror notabug.