use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~0 users here now
Please only post things related to the saidit website itself.
If you want a place to post any topic to the community, please post at /s/whatever or /s/worldnews
Saidit.net - State of the website - 5/24/2018 - Updated comment score display, 'controversial' renamed to 'funny'
submitted 1 year ago by magnora7 from self.SaidIt
view the rest of the comments →
[–]d3rr 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (2 children)
Yep term limits and some kind of easy way to hold a vote which bots can't easily game (must comment to vote, must be an active user for the vote to count, etc.). Maybe the election code automatically assigns new moderators too, to avoid the shenanigans that went on in r/conspiracy with their "algorithm".
[–]magnora7[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (1 child)
Yeah mod elections are not good, perhaps we could have a lottery mod system? Or maybe instead of term limits we could have a way to vote mods out?
I like the idea of mod turnover (I think), but I'm not sure the best way to do it yet.
[–]d3rr 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun - 1 year ago (0 children)
Yeah a lottery would work. Voting mods out might be an even better solution than term limits, I like it.
I've seen a bunch of ideas that are replacements for mods, but not much about fixing bad actor mods within the reddit model. Hopefully we'll get big enough to need to worry about it.