u/SolarEclipse, are you suffering for Schizophrenia by being the mod of /s/IncelTears and /s/Incels???

submitted by [deleted] from (self.SaidIt)

[deleted]

all 47 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Jesus-Christ 12 insightful - 3 fun12 insightful - 2 fun13 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

What is your obsession with incels?

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

He is the legendary Brazilian Sigma

[–]Jesus-Christ 7 insightful - 4 fun7 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

I had no idea who this was and so I found him on a wiki page, all these nicknames are funny as fuck. "UndercoverCopShootsManInFlipFlopsSigma"

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

He is a popular user on r/inceltears a sub used for false flagging and defaming incels by posting extremist and crazy incels to their subreddkt to fit the narrative that incels are dangerous, it is a wierd account he mostly lurks in sjw forums and he spends an average of 18 hours daily on reddit. By this description you would think Brazilian Sigma is a shill

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Who is legendary Brazilian Sigma?

[–]curryvirgin 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

I believe his intent was to take up the sub name before someone else could, with the intention of creating one like Reddit has here.

It's all good.

[–]Snow 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Saidit Rules for Moderators:

3) Subs cannot be designed to trick people, or to obviously undermine the quality of the website. This includes fake legal warning pages, honeytraps, or subs designed solely to cause problems for saidit.

u/d3rr

[–]curryvirgin 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's not a fake legal warning page, honeytrap, or a sub designed to cause problems for saidit. It does not trick people by design, as it is not designed in such a way to make people think it is something it is not.

I'll wave an olive branch, and suggest you join us, if you are also a virgin.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i don't make hard policy decisions and even if i did I would need way more context to be able to weigh in.

[–]Chipit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Cognitive dissonance, not schizophrenia. Schizophrenia does NOT mean what you think it means. Just stop already. You're in over your head.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

Cognitive dissonance is one of symptom of schizophrenia.

[–]Chipit 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Negative. It is feeling uncomfortable by holding two mutually contradictory positions. You're out of your depth here.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/theory-and-psychopathology/201312/cognitive-dissonance-and-psychosis

[–]Chipit 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Pop science magazines. You're out of your depth, kid.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

take the L kid he showed you proof

[–]Only71Genders 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

In his defense, the article refers to psychosis and not schizophrenia. Two completely different things.

Also, we should limit ourselves to one argument point each so this semantics debate can drag in as many people as possible. Keeping in true nature of semantics.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It COULD be schizophrenia, that's why I used a question mark on there.

[–]Only71Genders 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was talking about your article, not your OP

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (25 children)

I think the mods are breaking the 1st rule of mod rules. They created a specific rule for /s/Incels ?

Take a look at this

[–]Snow 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (20 children)

u/magnora7

u/d3rr

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (15 children)

Lol just can't stay away, huh...

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (14 children)

Just can't tag it NSFW,huh?

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (13 children)

Why should we inconvenience ourselves because you're vehemently opposed to free speech?

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

I didn't oppose to your free speech, it's you oppose my free speech by banned me.

Then I prefer let the IP2 sub flooding in "ALL" too , it still looks better this stupid incels sub.

u/magnora7 u/d3rr u/ScamCast

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I banned you because I was trying to help you avoid being triggered. Have you considered only looking at your subscribed subsaidits?

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I am trying to help you avoid being triggered by telling you have to hide the sub in "All".

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I appreciate the concern, but it does not trigger me to hear that. In fact, it makes me rather happy!

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Let it go, snow. Find something better to focus on

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Magnora, I was trying to defend my freedom of speech, which is very important for me, a mod can't ban people like that.

I am not obsessed for they can have sex or not.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You were being really rude

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I didn't oppose to your free speech, it's you oppose my free speech by banned me.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I have my rights of free speech that saying your sub is stupid in another sub.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Ok.

[–]ScamCast 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Whats up. You page me?

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

He’s an autist.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

You sound like an autist bro. Chill a bit

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

They even banned someone for this rule, I think they are trolls. The /s/Incels community don't want them from what I can see.

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

We banned him for using foid logic, you can go over on u/austin 's profile to see.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

What you said in that thread:

He got banned for having foid mentality, not being tall.
If he didn't drag the pyramid of debate down he wouldn't have been banned.

  • Firstly, foid mentality is thinking like a woman from what I can understand? How is that a valid point for banning him?
  • Secondly, the thread is about Incels being welcome to the sub, having a home. This user points out that this is not true. That is a comment on point.

We're not. Mods here hate tall incels and will ban them.

Also, I have taken a look at /u/austin and he is promoting his own website on /s/Incels where he is a MODERATOR.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

I want them tag NSFW for that damn sub and not showing at “all”.

[–]Antifa 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I'm deeply ambivalent about the incel thing, but literally monopolising saidit currently.

[–]basedaf1 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Incels have only a few hundred subscribers. Even in peak reddit days we were never that big, but easily had more activity than subs double our size. Instead of trying to convince saidit to implement soft censorship, why don't you try to convince saidit to be more active. PS I'm also tired of half the content being incel related

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

What the hell is soft censorship? The incels sub is family safe?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

the guy austin got exposed as a cucktears user today too

this is just like reddit lol

[–]Iceposeidonsarmthing 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I can’t figure out what is going on. Is one of them an incel and the other someone who hates incels?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Moderating both the incels sub and the inceltears sub is the shit.

If I was an IT shill I would have made the /s/IncelTears sub public but it's set at restricted.