you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mnemonic 16 insightful - 2 fun16 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 2 fun -  (9 children)

Going around posting shit about their sub while they did in fact answer you, seems like they aren't charmed by that kind of talking behind their backs.

I'm from a country with freedom of speech, but I won't be surprised if I'm not allowed into a bar when I go around town talking shit about the barkeeper behind his back.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I won't be surprised if I'm not allowed into a bar when I go around town talking shit about the barkeeper behind his back.

I keep a wig in my car.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

[–]Mnemonic 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

What rule did they break in your opinion by banning you? Seems to me this is a grey area because you went around their backs shit talking them in another sub instead of addressing your issues head on.

You did name call them: https://saidit.net/s/SaidIt/comments/15zs/the_sincels_sub_looks_stupid/

If someone comments something like "kys dummy Bengals are best idiot" then you have the option to ban them because it's not in good faith as per the pyramid of debate, despite being on topic.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Name call?

I didn't mention a name of them, but I mentioned the stupid rule of IT.

And that thread is NOT in their sub.

Mnemonic, just stop to being a drama.

[–]Mnemonic 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Yes, name calling: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling

just stop to being a drama.

You're the one making this all a drama, what rule did they break by banning you?

EDIT: name calling is even in the pyramid by name: https://saidit.net/static/PyramidDebate.jpg

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Well, this is my dictionary: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/name-calling

It seems powermods going to control freedom of speech outside their sub.

[–]Mnemonic 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

How does your given definition differ from mine?

And you still haven't answered what rule they did break according to you...

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Are you going to ban me on your subs just because I had an opinion different with you?

The post I complained is not in that sub, what is the right they ban me?

And I didn't "dragging discussion down the pyramid" on my complaining post.

Stop to quote out of context.

[–]Mnemonic 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As I said, it seems to me a grey area since you prefer to just post in another sub (calling them names) instead of engaging in the Original Thread. (that's what I call drama btw)

Are you going to ban me on your subs just because I had an opinion different with you?

No, why would you think that?

EDIT: What does your edit even mean? "Stop to quote out of context." I didn't quote anything there..

And I didn't "dragging discussion down the pyramid" on my complaining post.

That's where I think different then.