you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I wouldn't define Issac Newton as a "Lesser Male". I think that's a poor metric

[–]Snow 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

But I liked how you broke their theory:

First, they put the value of "have heterosexual sex" higher than everything, therefore, they can act like a drama and attacking for "cannot have heterosexual sex". (actually, they can buy prostitute, but they think they deserve the best ,not a whore, so they keep crying)

If the "have heterosexual sex" is not the highest value, there is no rights for they're acting a drama queen.

I wouldn't define Nikola Tesla as a ...

No, I don't even use their shitty language.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You can't use logic to communicate with that evil cult like internet community.

But you have to.