The /s/Incels sub looks stupid.

submitted by [deleted] from self.SaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mnemonic 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

They did explain it in a reply, at least their 'reasoning'. https://saidit.net/s/Incels/comments/12pw/why_fakecels_cucks_faggots_trannies_soyboys_and/1zun You even replied to it, not asking for clarification, just asking if the poster was thirsty... I mean, you didn't even try.

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 6 fun1 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

That reply just stupid. I was joking on it.

[–]Mnemonic 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Which one? Yours?

[–]Snow 1 insightful - 4 fun1 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Yours.

[–]Mnemonic 11 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Your previous could be explained in at least 2 ways as it's not well formed. Instead of choosing to answer normally to a question asking you to clarify what you mean, you choose the "joke on me" route.

Look no further as to why people stop engaging.