use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~9 users here now
SaidIt's main sub
New feature: Updated voting buttons (self.SaidIt)
submitted 10 months ago by magnora7
view the rest of the comments →
[–]OneGoodLaw 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago (1 child)
Just curious about your choice:
[the ancient up-down paradigm was nauseating]
I have always regarded voting as best a 2-dimensional affair:
* like vs dislike [the thought]
* bury vs promote [the post]
most people are not capable of separating 'agree' vs 'bury'
A post like this might be an example:
Fascism solves racism
You may agree or disagree (like+/-)
but the other question is whether the post was pointless. (bury +/-)
people usually regard what they like as what should be promoted.
But this is not always the case.
Posts about State killing is an example of where this goes wrong:
"Police/military kill multiple (innocent?) people."
The post merits being promoted,
but the core story is something few may "like"
[disagree this event should happen,
but it *merits being discussed]
Just curious as to how you settled on your choices.
[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 10 months ago* (0 children)
Yes, unfortunately the two end up becoming the same. Even on reddit the vote is supposed to denote the quality, but everyone uses it like an agree/disagree button. Having two upvote choices gives them an option instead of just another re-mapping up the up/down voting system.