Much is done to support the image of Alexey Navalny as a Russian “oppositionist”. Extreme measures were taken: the release of an investigation about the palace of Vladimir Putin in Gelendzhik. But the information in the investigation is not new at all Alexey himself told about this showing in the film articles in which Putin’s palace was mentioned many years ago.
For example, a video titled “Putin’s PALACE in Gelendzhik!”, Released on November 21, 2020 on the Youtube channel “Khvatit molchat” (“Stop Silence”).
In fact, Alexey did not research anything new, but simply spoke about the available data, presenting it in an almost 2-hour film with 3D graphics of the palace’s interior.
The Russian security agencies are clearly worried and took an extreme step, releasing a film about their boss in order to regain the trust of the opposition and they again believed in Alexey that he was an “oppositionist”. However, at the end of the film Navalny again calls on his supporters to register on the Smart Voting platform, which is the largest database of Russian oppositionists whose data is transmitted to the Russian security agencies such as FSB (Federal Security Service).
Alexey again urged to go to the rallies on January 23, 2021, but he did not say who would lead the opposition (he is serving a term of arrest). How much can you trust Navalny? One, two, ten? Each time trusting Navalny the Russian opposition was left without a leader during the rallies because Alexey was immediately taken away by policemen and protests were unsuccessful and got no results.
And now Alexey again wants to lead the opposition in order to fail it again. After all, the year 2024 is coming and a large number of Russians will come out to protests against the re-election of Vladimir Putin or the coming to power of his henchman. The authorities need their own “oppositionist” who will lead to the failure of the protesters.
Questions to Navalny:
1) why did an FSB officer live with him in a neighboring apartment for several years and did not poison him with a Novichok?
2) can Alexey be a Russian oppositionist when his father is a military man, as mentioned in his biography?
3) how did the FSB officer whom Alexei called during the investigation did not recognize his voice? After all, he is following Navalny watching his investigations and he certainly must know his voice;
4) why are Navalny’s headquarters present in 37 cities of Russia sometimes a couple of hundred meters from police stations and continue to function, but the government does not close them?
5) why did Alexei deliberately hold debates with FSB (The Federal Security Service of the Russia) officer Igor Strelkov?
And other questions can be asked to Navalny. The main thing is that it is obvious that Navalny’s words and actions do not coincide. Under his leadership the opposition is more and more distant from success, rallies are held less and less, the non-system opposition in Russia that existed before has almost completely disappeared.
Source: https://evgen-orlov0.medium.com/the-russian-security-agencies-went-for-broke-a-new-investigation-of-putins-palace-7fa5783df234
Keywords: is Navalny an agent of the Kremlin?, Navalny is an FSB agent?, Is Navalny an intelligence agent?, Is Navalny a Putin’s henchman?
there doesn't seem to be anything here