you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

But that quote was a fraud. I know that Belmont was a Rothschild employee. But Lincoln was mostly backed by the Frankfurt school of bankers, such as the Rothschilds who also had good relations with Imperialist Russia who came to the aid of Lincoln. Lincoln also had many Whigs around him as well. But I don't believe at that time, the Rothschild's controlled the Bank of England, I could be wrong though. I believe /u/789 would know.

I just learned too, that Andrew Jackson, the man who killed the archipelago British banks in the 1830's was funded by Rothschild.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But that quote was a fraud.

you think or you know?

Frankfurt school

that is an altogether different thing, although connected to the rothschilds, but it's just the source of cultural marxism. apples and oranges.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not that school, but the Frankfurt school of bankers, I wasn't specifiyng that actual school just a new school of learned bankers who wished to position themselves ahead of the British money-power.

They were German Jewsish bankers, as well as Swiss bankers such as the Seligman family.

That quote is a fraud until I can prove its real. I can't, and that's a problem. The heroizing of the Whig Lincoln into this mythological anti-bank figure is a lie spread by ignorance or liars like LaRouche, multilateralists and Neo-Hamiltonians.