In order for the management of the world to be possible, we must imagine a human being, then disperse it across all of the planet. What does a human being ultimately consist of, beyond it's consciousness? It's not it's actions, which are constantly getting removed from it's soul, it's not it's body, which is imposed on it. What is it then? It's choice to create the future consciousness. Before we can understand that sort of comglomerance, we must analyze how time works in relation to the mind's ability to choose multiple options out of the future. At first, this appears to mean I must designate an amount of time which contains me doing a selection process. But I didn't choose the circumstances I am in, regardless of if they impact my brain physically, and I don't remember choosing even close to the amount that I remember simply observing. If we are honest about the immediate human experience, this is not contestable. I, after all, have a million different drives and impulses, not just relating to wanting something but to, let's say, impulsively doing something. I am choosing, but only at the end. Now, this will be understood by explaining what I mean when I say "end." I, in fact, do not refer to a process somehow ending without me noticing, that would hardly be what people think of as free will. What I am refering to is the perceiver's inability to designate the time in which he is commiting an act of choosing multiple options out of the future, and, of course, being the architect of his future consciousness. This would be an objection, if only a human could determine how what is thought of as time, is moving. Since we cannot prove anything of the sort without collapsing into superstitions of previous millenniums, we have countless options open to us, out of which we cannot determine what is actually happening in relation to a human-held universality. I could, just as well, be choosing which gender to be born as. Both these things pose a problem for the veil theory of someone before being born. Would you prove something is unfair based on people being born differently? No. There is only the ACTUALITY of someone being something, and someone else being something else. Telling someone to imagine themselves being able to randomly be born into any body, is a weak analogy fallacy. There is not a universality which we can stick to the great "before" of the reality of the world. Claiming to know that I am not currently in the process of choosing my birth is nonsensical.

How can a human be determined as a universality, in relation to simply being a homo sapiens? This is impossible. Let us think what would happen if we had a set of homo sapiens which was believed to be a sample of human universality, this would mean that completely different experiences of perception are somehow responsible for creating the exact SAME thing? Of course not.

I should now turn to the biggest split in history. That of male vs female. In fact, it is a false comparison. I will not compare anything, because what is it about the sex that, in a bare bones way, was looked at as lower and as serving lower purposes by the orientals, the greats in philosophy, — the greats in science demonstrating this, the common-sensical of the primates knowing this. Of course, it is imbeciles who deny that making money is impossible and deny that getting laid is impossible, who will ignore the reality of the crass, impulsive, non-thinking, bloodthirsty, weaker, laid-out, predictable, lower sex. Nothing about differences in races can be said which could ever trump the difference between the sexes, if only they could get away with more, if only they could have a form of strength which wouldn't dissolve their inherent weakness. The idea that they are corresponding to what should be thought of as humanity was born on a worm-eaten fruit desecrated countless times and poisoned millions of times by the most dangerous insects. Whether a male who treats females as anything but what is laid out here, or something vaguely paralel, is experiencing what can truly be experienced out of life, is not worth arguing. Possibly for those who have experienced very little, it is worth talking over. For the meditator, or the hard worker — the wise one, it is impossible to descend back into the level where females are contained without thinking only short-term, only exceptionally, never universally. An actual clear view of reality destroys practically all power females hold in the world.

For this, we will remove a misguided male mind from thinking about how to get the social constructs of female validation in it's mind to appear in reality, we will instead explain something different. Female validation, known by it's actual poisonous and corrosive double-standards which are calculated as part of the female's survival instinct for violence, are no longer desireable. There can be no special exception to this undesireability. It is not true validation, since it comes from the repulsion where that female will also validate other men. It is, by nature, disgusting. Yet you are told that you are just not adapated enough to modern values if you don't want to be the closest thing to a cuckold without being one definitionally. A female could think the rational man is the least charismatic man on the planet, the least intelligent, the least productive... yet it would mean nothing. Other people's opinions don't determine the truth, why would the opinion of a female determine a man's accomplishments? If one is honest, it's not an accomplishment. Cold approach is not only completely ineffective but it is an attempt to breach the opportunity-blackpill which was created by the free choice of females, it is nonsensical, really it has all the properties of a social construct, not to even question the legality of it. No wonder it comes from people who will endlessly deny science to convince themselves that genetic traits aren't massively more important than "game." Let go of the mainstream ideas of attaining success with girls. It is determined by opportunities, which you don't control. This is much, much easier to admit about making money when you realize that the elites can control your opportunities and not let you gain what is already in the hands of the people at the top. Why would the system that controls sexual opportunities, whoever it is continuously created by, be different? The truth is that there is no "other side" to this, there is generally only the truth against the completely dogmatic things told to men to make them slaves of the system.

Why are females worshipped by the system? Precisely because of their manipulative nature, which causes a lie to spread that the female has a "soul." Even a MORALLY GOOD "soul." This soul would ultimately be, not more than such alienation from truth, a grain of light, clarity, universality, logic, love, fairness, reciprocity etc. that it's own lack of humanity needs to be projected into an outside circumstance in which a human can look at it and feel the same complete meaninglessness that the female makes itself think about connection between two people. It misunderstands the view of the world of the male so severely that it, unsurprisingly, even on a logical level, does not grasp why humans want to be with each other. In the eyes of the female, male selection is an act of violence. Imagine a mind so degenerated and unfeasibly subjected to it's own lowly constraints that it can tolerate a complete untruth for years on end, validating men who by their own hypothetical system would be bad. There is not much to be said about this, it's simple at it's core. What MUST not be simple is why they are not tolerated less.