all 6 comments

[–]sneako 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I thought you were polish brocel

[–]Mazurro[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because I am.

[–]takavoid513 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I guess we are just ahead of the curve. My theory is what is considered acceptable is what anything chad likes. It may be intentional or not, but when normies or foids see chad get involved with it they will get involved with it, because having chad use/play set thing removes the association of undesirables using/playing set thing and foids will use it as a way to get his attention.

[–]Mazurro[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's 100% true.

[–]TaseAFeminist4Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How about "community?" It used to mean, like, a neighborhood or town... maybe everyone from a school. Nowadays if two losers post crap on the internet about how they beat off to the same Japanese cartoon we call it a community.

[–]Mazurro[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It isn't the terminology and semantics which is hated - it's the idea and behavior behind it or even more importantly - who is involved in the idea or behavior.

If Chads would make a "community" of beating up foids, it would be praised, commented and treated as something positive.