How feds attempt to justify allowing fakecels and chads in their communities

submitted by depression_redditv3 from self.RealIncels

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]takavoid513 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I think you have to have the factor of being touchless to be considered an incel. This meaning no women has ever initiated intimate physical contact with you which has been done on purpose and not out of necessity for other reasons. I think its a key difference that filters the incels from the normies, though due to the pickiness of toilets that may be less and less of a divide.

I don't care too much about escortcels, but they should talked about their experiences on a separate forum or not brought up that much as it can be irritating to see such content, especially for those who are not well off in money wise or legally unable to escort in their own country.

[–]winkot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not being hugless or kissless and claiming to be incel is absurd for obvious reasons, but one of the reasons why it's different from just being non-touchelss is that a girl touching you indicates attraction but not necessarily that the male will actually get the results. Hugging and kissing are the very results themselves, and in case you didn't get those results, you're still incel.

Kissing and hugging cannot ever be explained away by anyone who isn't detached from reality, and also might very well satisfy someone so they don't have to worry about getting sex anymore.

This shows just how braindead incel forum mods are to allow someone who kissed and hugged without even flirting with said girls. Oh and btw that was elliot rodger.