Sympathetic foids are way worse than those who straight up us

submitted by Mazurro from (self.RealIncels)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]takavoid513 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

She saw a cash-cow from Kevin Samuels and is now exploiting it to gain the attention and approval of men. Some normies have an iq of an ameboid to think any women gives a shit about them, when its just toilets trying to milk the most attention possible by festering in all male spaces that you have mentioned.

If toilets did care, then they would be incriminating any toilets having sex before marriage, ban contraceptives and force them to date with their looks match, but that will never happen as having power over others is the most important thing for them as well as getting pumped and dumped by chad and will never take any form of responsibility for their actions.

[–]Mazurro[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Well, contraception is okay, it's just foid brains who refuse to date looksmatches and who just want to fuck chads without consequences. In Poland we have programmes supporting having kids (as in you get monthly pay for having one) plus they have banned abortion so more children were born but... We have the most deaths and the least newborns since WWII. I wonder when they will realize it's because of foids.

[–]takavoid513 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

That is a fair point. A Toilet's options and desires will always win out and they will always want to be chads cum-dumpster in the end, and if she fails to get him the whore will hide her past and find herself a backup betabucks.

My Idea was that banning contraceptives would aim to remove the security of having sexual intercourse with the higher threat of the toilet getting pregnant or catching STDs. It's why Premarital sex was so avoided in the past (as well as other factors like religion), in the fears of getting knocked up and abandoned as it could ruin her chances to get a husband. But with the creation of contraceptives, women having been going ham just to get their guts rearranged by chads.

I guess this would not work as it could be easily be bought as contraband and would be hard to enforce. In addition, in your countries case a foid getting knocked up would lead to her in getting free government bucks from the taxes of slaving incel workers.

[–]Mazurro[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

But in nigger gettos they cannot afford post-sex contraception and they end up pregnant, if we assume that abortion is illegal and they cannot seek doctor to perform it, you have the in the news later that:

"XX-age negress killed her child."

Foids feae ban of contraception and abortion, sure, but it's not something which will prevent them anymore.

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Just because the most stupid people of humanity are too stupid to act on incentives (which I think they still do to an extent), doesn't mean most women with more than 95 IQ won't change their behaviour based on consequences.

Most women will definitely not fuck Chad if there is a high chance of becoming single mother. Anything that reduces 80/20 ratio will benefit incels immensely.

"XX-age negress killed her child."

as you said for retards, not much will change. so this won't happen

[–]Mazurro[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I don't really believe in incel situation bettering up because of forced law for foids. I think they would rather kill themselves then even consider dating me. Our only hope - robowaifus

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You are gravely mistaken. Women can't kill themselves and they will follow whoever wins. Remember french whores when Nazis occupied them? What happened there is universal law.

[–]Mazurro[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Hmm this might be right. After all, foids like to scream a lot but they do nothing.

[–]greybeard 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm a big believer in incentives. A human is 10% individual and 90% environment. So stuff like this:

I think they would rather kill themselves then even consider dating me.

depends wholly on the civilization. Make it the optimal move for women to be Chad-only, and they'll do that. Have a civilization that punishes harems, whoredom and rewards stable marriages, and people will do that.

This counts for men to. The reason the men in Kongo are savages and western men are meek is the circumstances.

[–]Mazurro[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I was believer of stuff like that years ago. I thought that enabling or disabling laws and privileges will do anything.

The porblem is the society went too far. It's beyond possible to come back to reality and the only way to enforce that is to hit the opposite ground bottom - when there will be critical mass problem with how much rights and benefits foids were given, it will collapse because men will finally disagree.

This entire system works because of bluepilled men, who allow this behavior and have no self-awarness whatsoever.