you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ExposeFoids 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (11 children)

The same women who complain about being objectified are objectifying THEMSELVES better than any men could objectify them.

Exactly. I’m tired of this “men objectify and fetishize women" nonsense. They do it to themselves, women objectify themselves all the time by wearing overtly sexual clothing, infiltrating male spaces to get validation and incite male sexual competition, posting scantily clad photos of themselves online, etc. No one is forcing them to do what they do. Furthermore I would dare to say that these women want to be objectified. They relish in the attention and validation they receive when Chads gawk at them. They understand that their sexuality is their primary asset. Men are attracted to beauty biologically, because it signals health and reproductive success. They’re acting like a men’s nature is innately evil. (They’ll take the masculinity when it benefits them, when it saves their life from an intruder, but otherwise they can say masculinity is evil when it’s what allowed humanity to survive for millennia).

If anything, men love women much more than women love men, which is why this objectify thing is such a scam. Men aren’t the ones monkey-branching and treating lower value women like untouchable subhumans. Most men love women. Men love idealistically, women love opportunistically, when a man loves a woman he truly loves her and is willing to provide for her and die for her. A woman can only love a man on the condition that he has decent genetics and has enough looks, money or status. Women can easily jump between partners and file for divorce without good cause.

[–]Mazurro 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I would dare to say that these women want to be objectified

Dare? It's "water is wet" kind of observation. Obviously they want to be objectified, but only by Chad.

If anything, men love women much more than women love men.

Foids aren't capable of love. They love this personification of attractive genes or possibilities that it gives to her, take looks from Chad and look whether foid will remain with him. 100% of them wouldn't.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Obviously they want to be objectified, but only by Chad.

You are correct, many women do want to be objectified, it makes them feel desirable and valued. But like you say, this only makes them feel valuable if the person objectifying them is perceived to have high mating value (a 'Chad' if you will). If they think you are lower than them in value, they become insulted that you perceive them to be a potential match

[–]AXXA 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

You don't have an argument. You objectify women with your username. "Foid" is dehumanizing language that objectifies women.

[–]Mazurro 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

It's not objectifying them, it's dehumanizing them. Exactly as it should. Foids are hive-mind, they aren't sentient beings.

[–]AXXA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

If you believe that then you will never succeed at having a relationship with a woman. You're not a "involuntary celibate." You're a woman hater that will never have an emotional connection with a woman.

[–]Mazurro 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I definitely will never succeed at finding a FOID due to my genetics. And I am not voluntary celibate - if I wasn't hating women, then I wouldn't partner either way

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Isn't that moids too?

[–]ExposeFoids 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm just calling a spade a spade. Take your bullshit moralizing elsewhere.

[–]AXXA 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Actually I'm the one that's telling it like it is. You're the one with bullshit moralizing. You claim that you don't objectify women when you clearly do heavily dehumanize and objectify women. That means that you are the hypocrite. It's really sad too because you really aren't an "involuntary celibate". You are purposeful in your hate of women. No woman will ever love you because you clearly hate them.

[–]ExposeFoids 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're an idiot, confirmed.