all 4 comments

[–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So this is basically a proof basic trigonometry is true (as I pointed out in the Reddit title). Honestly, I never really understood why everybody assumed/accepted this as intuitive; I found it to be a relatively huge leap in logic and counter-intuitive, so I thought up this proof myself.

One thing to note is the choice of direction. I mention lining them up vertically , but there is no reason to take this specific direction. As long as they are the same in one direction, it is fine, but I wrote up vertical to avoid becoming unnecessarily verbose.

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

    If the length of one side of a right triangle is fixed

    Yes, your argument makes sense and is intuitive from there. But it requires one side's length to be fixed, so it's doesn't prove that only the angles generate a fixed ratio, and no intuition from that argument comes to me that can prove only the angles generate the ratio.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Not to me.

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]CompleteDoubterII[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Yes, on a flat surface. But that's to do with the real world, and not with right-angled triangles.