you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Lancet was retracted because of complete faked data.
The first study in Nature was bullshit too, based on cherry picking. That was the letter in Nature you refer to?
Or did they publish new bullshit again?
The medicine companies are really good at it.

Because you are so ignorant, and maybe some others are too, I will make a small sourced list.

[–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]FediNetizen 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    I woke up this morning and checked Saidit, and when I say my replies I had to do a double take.

    When I first looked, it seemed like someone was spamming one of the same studies I'd already linked multiple times the previous night, including in the very comments where I both linked and discussed the study in question. But surely no one is that dense, right?

    Turned out, yep, that's exactly what it was. So now I have to ask: what is it like to have the reading comprehension of a toucan?