Women for Trump vs. women for Sanders

submitted by Chipit from i0.wp.com

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]JasonCarswell 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Meh. It wouldn't be difficult to find Trump Grannies and juxtapose them with Bernie Babes. It's all tribal nonsense anyway.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It speaks to a larger issue: Trump is in favor of freedom; Sanders is in favor of Islamic oppression of women, because Trump dislikes Islam.

People expose themselves as complete pieces of trash, teaming up with the worst the planet has to offer - just so they avoid being on the same side as Americans. That is the magic of Trump, forcing America's enemies to cover themselves in shit and parade in public where everyone can see who they really are.

[–]JasonCarswell 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

I guess, but I hardly think Trump is really in favour of freedom - other than freedom for the ruling class.

Trump doesn't dislike Islam. He shared that glowing ball with Saudi's who host the worst kind, Wahhabism, the real bad apples of all the Muslims.

America's enemies are just largely propagandists ideas.

And Sanders is an old fashioned centrist, with the spine of a jellyfish. He can talk a lot of good stuff, but gets none done - and he was a coward when it counted in 2016.

[–]Chipit[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The ruling class? The man who is in the WWE hall of fame? Professional wrestling is not something that ruling class indulge in. It is 100% lower class entertainment.

So Trump's Muslim ban means he likes Muslims. Gimme a break. Saudi Arabia gets a pass from our unelected government because they sit on all the oil, and they play ball. In return they spend lavishly on weapons and enrich the military-industrial complex.

America's enemies are people like this, who say "Iraq needs regime change again".

Sanders is a old fashioned socialist. The kind that supported Cuba and honeymooned in Moscow.

[–]SpeakEasy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Get a better photoshop artist.

There's obviously both hot and ugly women that support both sides, but you're missing the bigger picture. The two-party system is rigged and we're fucked sideways either way, although I'm partial to the belief that Sanders would be less rough. Trump has proclaimed that much of what he does is directly influenced by Israel, a foreign country conducting terrorist activities on Palestinians and has openly spied on our own country for their benefit. That's as bad if not worse as open collusion with Russia.

Tribalism is stupid, and politicians are not your friend. They hate you. They wish they could do what they want without people disagreeing with them. Think for yourself.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

There's obviously both hot and ugly women that support both sides

Actually not.

Did you know that conservatives are statistically, on average, taller, stronger, more attractive, earn more, more successful in life in general, higher test, more sexually satisfied, more happy and less mentally ill?

Yup.

[–]SpeakEasy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Please, find a reliable source that proves this, because this would be a revelation to me.

[–]Chipit[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Really? You didn't hear about it? It was all the rage a while back. Moreover, you can just see it with your own eyes. Scan the crowds next time you see a Trump rally, and compare it to the people who show up to hear Sanders. It's just obvious.

https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/D5214D0CAE37EE5947B7BF29762547EE/S0730938417000181a.pdf/effects_of_physical_attractiveness_on_political_beliefs.pdf

Utilizing measures of attractiveness across multiple surveys, we examine the relationship between attractiveness and political beliefs. Controlling for socioeconomic status, we find that more attractive individuals are more likely to report higher levels of political efficacy, identify as conservative, and identify as Republican. These findings suggest an additional mechanism for political socialization that has further implications for understanding how the body intertwines with the social nature of politics.

Also, http://www.nationaleconomicseditorial.com/2017/05/25/weak-men-prefer-socialism/

A new study published in the Evolution and Human Behavior journal, by researchers at Brunel University, London, found that physically weaker men are more likely to favor socialism than stronger men.

The study sampled 171 men, and looked at their height, weight, bicep circumference, and overall physical strength—then they compared these traits with the men’s views on the redistribution of wealth, and income inequality.

They found that physical weakness was correlated to a preference for socialism.