all 3 comments

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The military-industrial-banking complex would win, that's who would win.

[–]sawboss[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I notice you aren't rebutting any of the specific points made in the video. And you also haven't explained how this "military-industrial-banking complex" you suppose could benefit from a civil war in America. There are hints in the video which might help you develop such a hypothesis.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The military-industrial-banking complex would profit from selling arms to both sides of the civil war, as they have profited by similarly arming both sides of most wars in the last 200 years.

The banks benefit because they make the loans to pay for all this.

And the war gets everyone emotionally caught up in it, so they think all this spending is justified and unavoidable. In the end, we just feed the beast, regardless of which side wins. The only winning move is not to play.