you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

When people have only a choice between staying home and watching their children starve and taking to the streets, then there is grave danger of a civil war. (I cannot attribute this but it was said about the French Revolution.) I do not think slavery was the root cause of the first US Civil War and I do not think abortion is a divisive enough issue to cause a second civil war. Tim Pool is being much too alarmist at this time. If people do not have enough to eat and feed their children—and that might happen soon enough—then there could be a civil war. But the war would not be about abortion; it would between the government and the rich on one side and the poor on the other. Mr. Pool has his hat on too tight.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Tim Pool is being much too alarmist at this time.

I don't think it's by accident. Whether it's because he dwells in drama or because he and Dore and others are catching up and ramping up their corruption and rigged system awareness and maybe the limited hangouts are finally allowed to. They still won't criticize 9/11 or Zionism.

[–]hennaojichan 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

As always, a good point. It never fails to shock me when the news or even a drama is speaking realistically and then you realize that the official story of 9/11 is assumed and we're expected to believe Israel is our best buddy. As always, cognitive dissonance is a must have in North America today. I have often thought that he works for one of the three-letter agencies.