Rules of Engagement: Why is the military held to a higher standard than our own police?

submitted by magnora7 from i.redd.it

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Tom_Bombadil 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Serve and protect (the wealthy and their assets).

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Supreme court rules "serve and protect" means nothing and the police are not in any way beholden to it. But that doesn't stop them from putting it on every cop car.

America: The land of false advertising

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'd prefer that if they get "the fear" we should just take away their guns and give them a diaper.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Who? The wealthy?

I think everyone deserves protection, and a life absent of fear.

My proposed solution: Arm everyone with muzzle-loaded muskets, lead shot, and black powder.

Threatening someone else's safety, should carry some inherent risk to the aggressor. As well as, a plausible risk of repercussion.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The po-po.

The wealthy too.

Or everyone keep their guns and stop exploiting and executing each other.