Cop Pulls Out Gun Over Failure To ID - No Crime Being Committed

submitted by BusyYellow from youtu.be

all 8 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]fatman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

i remember this orange man audits gay guy, he was loudly suffering from a bad case of TDS a few years ago.

[–]BusyYellow[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is tds when Trump supporters run away from questions?

[–]Brewdabier 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

First thing that got my attention was dude saying I dident thank you guys were coming out, next he say's I'm a journalist then says I'm independent and last he refused to provide ID. 99.99 % of the time cops see this as a criminal or someone looking for trouble.

The dude is an Attention whore looking for karma and needs some jail time. Shame I can't down vote shit for brains

[–]BusyYellow[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

What law did he break?

[–]Brewdabier 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

law enforcement officer stops a person suspected of criminal behavior and ask for identification. Failure by the person stopped to respond is a violation of the law and can lead to arrest and criminal charges. Dude is saying he's a "journalist" but provides no proof, lastly the " journalist" is a karma whore looking for attention and wasting cops time.

Dude, how hard is it to Google. In a land of the witless, you sure would be king.

[–]BusyYellow[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"Failure by the person stopped to respond is a violation of the law and can lead to arrest and criminal charges."

False.

Failure to ID is what is known as a 'secondary charge.' It's what happens when you're lawfully arrested for a crime, and then refuse to identify yourself.

No where in America are you required to identify yourself, simply when asked by law enforcement. Not even when driving a motor vehicle. There needs to be a driving infraction to be legally required to identify. Just like R.A.S. Reasonable Articulable Suspicion.

I love it when people say "google" something, and then when I do it proves when wrong with literally every single link.

Source 1 Wiki - Stop and ID laws by state (spoiler: there is no such thing anywhere)

Source 2 Florida (where travis was) Case Law

Source 3 - ILRC

Source 4 - NOLO - Kinda like wiki, but for legal stuff - Website literally says you're a moron who knows nothing about what you speak, and that you should be laughed at.

Now, here is where you get to make a choice:

You can choose to admit you're 100% wrong, and learn something today.

OR

You can choose to remain ignorant, ignore the facts I have laid out before you proving everything you believe on this subject is false, and continue believing things that are untrue and easy to fact check in a matter of seconds. This option would also include no reply, simply because admitting you're wrong hurts you physically.

Will you choose to remain ignorant to facts, or admit you're wrong. I'm on the edge of my seat, waiting to see what option you pick!

[–]Brewdabier 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

A windows 10 lawyer, I trust you law knowledge as much as I can drink mercury.

[–]BusyYellow[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As predictable as you could ever be. It's to be expected from cops and bootlickers. You ignore facts because you would prefer to remain ignorant and spout nonsense. Learning physically hurts you. That's why you dropped out.

Did you know there's maximum IQ limitations for most police departments? Look it up, meatball.

Dude, how hard is it to Google? In a land of the ignorant, you'd be king.