you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Wouldn't that be history making! Hate crimes against women actually being named hate crimes!

Sigh

Edit. So many excuses listed in the article as to why some think misogyny "shouldn't" legally be hate crime. All bull.

[–]Happy_face_caller[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah it would be tremendous.

But also yeah excuses and now they are trying to use “gender neutral” language which makes it pointless

[–]one1won 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nothing can exist without men/women can have nothing of their own•. /s

•except gestation, childbirth, physically violent DV experiences, rape, lifelong fear/wariness... Men don't seem too eager for the reality of those. A women dare mention a daydream of sucker punching a deserving a-hole, and the incensed moids come out in mass screaming "violence". (Yet their death threats to women on social media are excusable?!?!) Men are fragile. They can't live with the truth of their own failures and faults. That's why I still call 'em weinies. It's pun-ish and accurate. LOL

(Probably just opened my fifth username here to get comprised. F it. Ill just make another.)

[–]Happy_face_caller[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That user name part was too real lol.

And yes we can uniquely get death threats, raped and murdered at disproportionate rates but men have to be included in legislation meant to protect us from them.

But they will say this with confidence and it’s not satire. They demand they are victims at the same rate unironically. Weinies is right lol