40 year old Coomer uses 1847 law to win damages after parents throw away huge porn stash.

submitted by Happy_face_caller from mlive.com

all 3 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Silverhatband 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Too bad the parents are not able to address this via residence ownership rights. The parents say they warned the 42 yo son not to bring porn into their house when he moved back in, that the porn would be destroyed.

Lessons: 1- dont let your ingrate adult son move back! 2- If you don't follow #1, treat him like a tenant, put it in writing!!!

The parents'll be damn fools if they don't write this cumbrain/waste of oxygen out of their wills!

Ex-wife must've gotten financially hosed, not only during the marriage, but in the divorce, too, if the porn stash was that valuable!

[–]Happy_face_caller[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I thought the same thing about the no porn in rhe house rule.

Also yeah why isn’t the wife getting half of the settlement if he had the porn when they were a couplex

Good point

[–]babalonsCup 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Either way, what fucking scum. Bringing the people who gave you life to court over documented sex?