My reply to theoretical physics expert.

Quantum entanglement for babies: https://saidit.net/media/cL2JTPz2a96-NsM_HN78ykzJRRTxqLlloBxqwY9Nsd0.jpg

I wonder why Plank's loader model is always avoided. It is the simplest solution. It has no invisible magic. Actually, in experiments we see that it works better.

Explained: Modernized Plank's loader model: Threshold model. Quantum model that has no particles: Instead it uses "loop locked waves" to store energy and state. Like we see in super conductors, where loops of electric current store magnetic flux "particles".

Using energy storage with loops creates thresholds, which then replace the "measurement". Energy quanta are transferred via resonance instead of particles in a collapsing wave. So in this model the locked wave goes up in energy state, instead of the wave function goes down in state.

Example: in normal QM one would model ONE photon particle hitting a pixel-sensor of the camera. Now we have a light-wave of ONE "photon" hitting all pixel-sensors of the camera, and the sensors that reach a certain energy threshold get activated. On average exactly one. In most cameras you can change the threshold level of the sensors via the ISO settings. So this concept is already well integrated in our technology.

The observations are only slightly different, except for high energy particles. In those cases you will find more often multiple quanta detections, or none at all. As if 2 quantum particles were suddenly present. And indeed experiments with high energy quanta do show this phenomenon. So you do not get quantum magic, nor bad science. I dont know exactly, they are often observed with superconductors.. But it is a bit like asking how magnetism exist, and probably has the same answer.