AI solves nuclear fusion puzzle for near-limitless clean energy by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Did they tap a spoon on it's eye, ear, or neck to piss off the scientists with one simple trick?

AI solves nuclear fusion puzzle for near-limitless clean energy by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–]hfxB0oyA[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Tough crowd. You're all right, though.

AI solves nuclear fusion puzzle for near-limitless clean energy by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–]package 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This isn't "solving a puzzle" it's demonstrating software that could potentially react quickly enough to maybe keep a fusion reaction stable and contained.

AI solves nuclear fusion puzzle for near-limitless clean energy by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–]twolanterns 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

sure it did

let us know when it is even a laboratory trick let alone demonstrates a scaleable methodology

AI solves nuclear fusion puzzle for near-limitless clean energy by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

AI does not solve that problem.

This article reads like some spam advertisement, since it overhypes a very hypothetical discovery.

belief in the multiverse by [deleted] in Physics

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nah I already know about this

belief in the multiverse by [deleted] in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You may like to look at the link I provided.
It explains how "back to the drawing board" looks like.

belief in the multiverse by [deleted] in Physics

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Quantum mechanics is fake, scientists couldn't figure something out so said it's impossible to figure out. No get back to the drawing board.

belief in the multiverse by [deleted] in Physics

[–]Jiminy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think there's one universe and it's infinite.

belief in the multiverse by [deleted] in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The multiverse is not based on rational ground, but it is an extension of the multiworld interpretation of quantum mechanics.

The multiworld interpretation is based on the idea that every quantum-event happens. But each event happens in a different "world". Where the "world" is a local environment. With "observing" you choose a world, somehow.

The interpretation is false, because a quantum-event is not a single event. It is a continuous process, like each radioactive decay may happen at any time. And each "photon" observation happens at any time.
So even a single event would create infinite number of worlds, and each following event would create infinite number of worlds again.
It also gives some kind of god-power to some "observer", which is not well defined.

The interpretation is popular because:
Mathematicians do not care about infinite, but also do not understand how many infinites this interpretation would produce.
And theoretical physicians do not care about infinite, because they just want some numerical answer.
A lot of theorists misuse the multiworld interpretation to claim that the "world" is actually a simulation or the "observer" is some god-like entity.

The physical reality:
But in physical reality, most of these quantum mechanics interpretations are based on Einstein's interpretation of the photoelectric effect.
And that has been falsified.
How it is falsified is explained in more detail here

Time Crystals: Magic of the Quantum Multiverse by UBERGheist in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I try to keep /s/Physics to something that is physical.
Try to post stuff related to experiments or whatever slightly physical.

The video does not even know what time-crystals are in quantum physics.
Describe something closer to some kind of religious experience.

In my opinion, time-crystals are just a hype-word for resonating atomic structures.
But they are misunderstood even by quantum physics experts, due to their overuse of maths.

Logical Qubits: A Watershed Moment for Scalable Quantum Computing by UBERGheist in Physics

[–]VIOLENTMONKEY 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A Watershed Moment for Scalable Quantum Computing

In the realm of quantum computing, a watershed moment has been reached, heralding the advent of scalable quantum computers. As this technology continues to evolve, it holds immense promise in revolutionizing numerous fields, including materials science, drug discovery, and artificial intelligence. This groundbreaking development marks a turning point in the history of computing, with the potential to tackle challenges that have remained elusive to classical computers. Scalable quantum computers, unlike their classical counterparts, harness the principles of quantum mechanics, such as superposition and entanglement, to perform computations. This enables them to solve certain problems exponentially faster. By leveraging these unique properties, scalable quantum computers can break through the limitations of classical computing, unearthing new insights and unlocking previously inaccessible possibilities. The implications of scalable quantum computing are vast and multifaceted. This technology has the potential to revolutionize drug discovery by simulating complex biological systems and accelerating the development of targeted therapies. In the realm of materials science, scalable quantum computers can aid in the design of novel materials with enhanced properties, leading to advancements in sectors such as energy storage and electronics. Moreover, this technology promises to transform the field of artificial intelligence by enabling the creation of more powerful and versatile AI algorithms, capable of tackling complex tasks with unprecedented efficiency. The advent of scalable quantum computers marks a new chapter in the history of technology. With its ability to solve problems that have defied classical computers, this technology has the potential to reshape industries and transform our understanding of the world around us. As we continue to explore the frontiers of quantum computing, we stand at the threshold of a new era, filled with infinite possibilities and boundless opportunities.

Worlds largest Hyperloop Company GOES BANKRUPT! - Thunderf00t (The science fiction fantasy not work in the real world due to obvious physics problems) by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

there was more than one company (other than sub companies contracted with) ???

Worlds largest Hyperloop Company GOES BANKRUPT! - Thunderf00t (The science fiction fantasy not work in the real world due to obvious physics problems) by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Summary:

Thunderfoot has pointed out the immense problems with the Hyperloop,
and has also videos about several other scams.

The video is full with people promoting this failed fantasy. Starting with Elon.
Also people that attacked Thunderfoot.

Hyperloop

The plan was to create high speed trains in vacuum tunnels. That idea was also invented 100 years ago.
It did not work at that time either.

They wanted to use propellers to propel in a vacuum. Which can never work.
"The hyperloop can generate more power than it consumes", and more such nonsense.

Vacuum tunnels are extremely dangerous, especially at the transits.
They are very difficult to keep sealed, especially over long distances and at the stations.
Even with simple technical problems or small accidents, passengers may get exposed to vacuum.
Let alone big accidents, like a truck accident causing breakage of a part of the system.
It will be an easy target for terrorists.

They do not reduce the air resistance much, because a train generally only has one front surface that gets all the air resistance.
So the benefits are minimal.

They did not even look at the engineering of high speed trains in Japan that are now running and optimally engineered.
There are problems that occur with higher speeds.

The costs of building and maintaining such a system.

Download eFootball PES 2021 Torrent PC Download Grátis Português PT-BR 2024 by Torrentcrackeado in Physics

[–]Torrentcrackeado[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

eFootball PES 2021 Torrent PC Grátis Português Pro Evolution Soccer 2021 é o mais novo jogo da conhecida série Pro Evolution Soccer. Foi lançado em 15 de setembro de 2020 e rapidamente ganhou popularidade entre os fãs de jogos esportivos., um dos jogos de futebol mais esperados de cada temporada é o eFootball da Konami.

The Ultimate Solution for Physics Assignment Woes: Unveiling Physics Assignment Help by lilyjhonson00 in Physics

[–]lilyjhonson00[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As a dedicated physics tutor, I understand the challenges students face when tackling complex assignments. That's why I'm excited to share a valuable resource that can transform the academic journey for physics enthusiasts – Physics Assignment Help. This website is a game-changer for students struggling with physics assignments, offering a comprehensive platform designed to enhance understanding and boost grades.

Why Physics Assignment Help Stands Out: Physics Assignment Help is not just another website; it's a lifeline for students navigating the intricacies of physics assignments. The platform provides expert guidance and resources that simplify even the most challenging concepts.

A Closer Look at the Features:

Specialized Assistance: The website connects students with skilled tutors and experts who specialize in various physics topics, ensuring personalized support. Comprehensive Resources: From study materials to sample solutions, Physics Assignment Help is a treasure trove of resources catering to different learning styles. Timely Support: Students can access assistance whenever they need it, helping them meet deadlines and gain a deeper understanding of physics concepts.

The universe is a black hole computer by jet199 in Physics

[–]DesertOfMirrors 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So Neoplatonism with extra steps.

Not that that’s a bad thing.

At light speed, Einstein's equations break down and nothing makes sense by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–]ZekeTheAnt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Did you realize general relativity is getting cracks ?

I never liked Einstein's theories: for my flavor, his Lorentz-parameters fit sort of "too good".

I'm quite sure relativity will be well be understood, once material science advances with some Bigfoot-boots and not this ant-like, like till now.

Sadly, capitalism, as a system to enrich the rich, hinders this kind of natural progress hard.

I pray, that Musk and Bezos die onboard their "own" rockets. Earlier is better in this context.

At light speed, Einstein's equations break down and nothing makes sense by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–]ZekeTheAnt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

As assumed by their prequeresites. Where is the news in this ?

Quantum Mechanics Defies the Arrow of Time Through Backwards Causation by UBERGheist in Physics

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

uh, no.

hypothesis

Quantum Mechanics Defies the Arrow of Time Through Backwards Causation by UBERGheist in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Quantum mechanics has been falsified
No need for time travel, multiple worlds or whatever strange things.

Quantum Mechanics Defies the Arrow of Time Through Backwards Causation by UBERGheist in Physics

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Old news. Feynman wrote about it in Q.E.D.

avana by kaigaikusuri in Physics

[–]kaigaikusuri[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

アバナ 100mg | 50%オフをゲット|男性の健康https://indokusuri.com/product/avana-100mg/ by kaigaikusuri in Physics

[–]kaigaikusuri[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

<a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">Product Details</a> Avana is a generic version of Stendra. It is mainly used as a treatment for <a href="url">ED (erectile dysfunction)</a>.

The active ingredient avanafil inhibits the activity of enzymes that prevent erections. It also has the effect of dilating blood vessels through the brain. It increases the amount of blood sent to the corpus cavernosum through enzyme inhibition and vasodilation, and maintains the hardness of the penis by increasing blood flow in the corpus cavernosum.

Avanafil is an ingredient invented by Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma in Japan, and is the latest ED treatment developed with the goal of having "few side effects and high immediate effects."

The effects of Avana start to appear within 15 to 30 minutes after oral administration. Estimated duration is approximately 5 to 8 hours.

<a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">how to use</a> Take 1 tablet at a time approximately 30 minutes to 1 hour before sexual activity. The maximum daily dose is 200mg (2 tablets), and please wait at least 24 hours before taking the next dose.

*The above is an example. Dosage: The dosage may be adjusted depending on your symptoms and age, so please consult your doctor before taking this medicine.

<a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">Notes</a> Please drink with water or lukewarm water. (Be careful when using this medicine in combination with alcohol. Be careful not to drink too much, as drinking a large amount can impair nerve transmission, resulting in decreased erectile strength and difficulty in feeling sexual stimulation.)

Avana is said to be less affected by meals than Viagra, etc., but it may not be as effective immediately if taken after meals. We recommend that you take this medicine on an empty stomach, or 2 hours after a meal.

The effect will only appear when there is sexual arousal and stimulation. Even after ejaculation, it is possible to get an erection again and have sex while the ingredients are still effective.

If you are an elderly person, please consult your doctor and use caution.

Side effects include dizziness, so be careful when driving a car, working at heights, or operating dangerous machinery.

If you have allergies, please check the main raw materials and ingredients before using. If you feel any abnormality in your body after taking this medicine, please consult your doctor immediately.

Some medicines do not mix well with this medicine, so if you are taking other medicines, including Chinese herbal medicines or herbal products, please check with your doctor or pharmacist to see if there is any risk of taking this medicine together.

<a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">side effects</a> Headaches, hot flashes, dizziness, stuffy nose, indigestion, palpitations, bloodshot eyes, and visual abnormalities may occur. In a small number of reports, severe side effects include priapism and penile ankylosis, a condition in which an erection does not return to normal.

Contraindications/drugs prohibited for concomitant use It is prohibited to take with drugs such as antibiotics, analgesics, anticancer drugs, antiarrhythmia, hypertension, hypotension, heart failure, angina. Also, please note that this product cannot be used by people who are taking nitroglycerin, amyl nitrite, or isosorbide nitrate, which are used to treat heart disease.

Do not use this product if you are a minor, have a history of hypersensitivity to the ingredients of this drug, or have a blood disorder, cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, severe liver dysfunction, low blood pressure, heart disease, or arrhythmia.

This is a product for adult men, so women should not use it.

Active ingredient <a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">Avanafil, Avanafil</a>

Storage method Avoid high temperatures, high humidity, direct sunlight, and store out of reach of small children and pets.

for more information and get best offers click now :- <a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/">Okusurijapan.shop.com</a>

アバナ 100mg | 50%オフをゲット|男性の健康https://indokusuri.com/product/avana-100mg/ by kaigaikusuri in Physics

[–]kaigaikusuri[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

<a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">商品詳細</a> Avana は Stendra のジェネリック版です。 主に<a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product-category/ed-treatment/">ED(勃起不全)</a>の治療薬として使用されます。

有効成分アバナフィルが勃起を妨げる酵素の働きを阻害します。 脳内の血管を拡張する効果もあります。 酵素阻害と血管拡張により海綿体に送られる血液量を増加させ、海綿体の血流を増加させることで陰茎の硬さを維持します。

アバナフィルは日本の田辺三菱製薬が発明した成分で、「副作用が少なく即効性が高い」ことを目標に開発された最新のED治療薬です。

アバナの効果は、経口投与後 15 ~ 30 分以内に現れ始めます。 所要時間の目安は5~8時間程度です。

<a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">使用方法</a> 性行為の約30分~1時間前に1回1錠を服用してください。 1日の最大摂取量は200mg(2錠)で、次の服用まで24時間以上あけてください。

※上記は一例です。 用量:症状や年齢により適宜増減されますので、服用前に医師に相談してください。

<a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">注意事項</a> 水またはぬるま湯と一緒にお飲みください。 (アルコールとの併用には注意してください。多量に摂取すると神経伝達が障害され、勃起力の低下や性的興奮を感じにくくなることがありますので、飲みすぎには注意してください。)

アバナはバイアグラなどに比べて食事の影響を受けにくいと言われていますが、食後に服用してもすぐには効果が出ない場合があります。 空腹時または食後2時間以内に服用することをお勧めします。

性的興奮や刺激がある場合にのみ効果が現れます。 射精後も成分の効果が残っているうちに再び勃起してセックスすることが可能です。

ご高齢の方は医師にご相談の上、十分ご注意ください。

副作用としてはめまいなどがありますので、車の運転や高所での作業、危険を伴う機械の操作などには注意してください。

アレルギーのある方は主原料・成分をご確認の上、ご使用ください。 服用後、身体に異常を感じた場合は、直ちに医師にご相談ください。

この薬と飲み合わせにくい薬もありますので、漢方薬やハーブ製品など他の薬を服用している場合は、飲み合わせの危険性がないか医師または薬剤師に相談してください。

<a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">副作用</a> 頭痛、ほてり、めまい、鼻づまり、消化不良、動悸、目の充血、視覚異常が起こることがあります。 少数の報告では、持続勃起症や勃起が正常に戻らない状態である陰茎強直症などの重篤な副作用が報告されています。

禁忌・併用禁止薬 抗生物質、鎮痛剤、抗がん剤、抗不整脈剤、高血圧、低血圧、心不全、狭心症などの薬との併用は禁止されています。 また、心臓病の治療に使用されるニトログリセリン、亜硝酸アミル、硝酸イソソルビドを服用中の方は本製品を使用できませんのでご注意ください。

未成年者、本剤の成分に対して過敏症の既往歴のある方、血液疾患、脳梗塞、脳出血、重度の肝機能障害、低血圧、心臓病、不整脈などのある方は使用しないでください。

成人男性向けの商品ですので女性の方のご使用はご遠慮ください。

有効成分 <a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/product/%e3%82%a2%e3%83%90%e3%83%8a-100mg/">アバナフィル、アバナフィル</a>

保存方法 高温、多湿、直射日光を避け、小さなお子様やペットの手の届かないところに保管してください。

詳細については、今すぐクリックして最高のオファーを入手してください:- <a href="https://www.okusurijapan.shop/">Okusurijapan.shop.com</a>

Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature by GB43 in Physics

[–]TiberSeptim 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I know. I’ve lost respect for NASA once they started un ironically working on a “warp drive”. It’s really sad to watch people who absolutely should know better fall for obviously wrong ideas that they simply want to believe that interstellar travel will work like it does on TV.

Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature by GB43 in Physics

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Fifth force of nature is Life (according to the "Beast Master" old tv show) or Love - as in The Fifth Element

Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature by GB43 in Physics

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

$cience

Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature by GB43 in Physics

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I would argue that the bigfoot hunters have found much more evidence of bigfoot than these people have found for their "new force". Modern day science has been completely consumed by fraud.

Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature by GB43 in Physics

[–]twolanterns 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

closing in is as good as a mile

news will be WHEN they actually do it

else it is the same as all those TV shows where they never quite find what they go after -- sometimes whole seasons without really finding anything.

.

Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature by GB43 in Physics

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's your mom.

Scientists at Fermilab close in on fifth force of nature by GB43 in Physics

[–]Canbot 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Bullshit.

This is a repeat of a study that was done a while ago at a different accelerator. It was recreated at fermilab for greater accuracy.

Not new. Not a different force than previously known. It is a difference between what they expect to see from theory and what experiments measure. The theory predicts 2. Measurements are not 2. They already knew that. All that is new is they measured the discrepancy to a greater degree of accuracy.

Why is the Copenhagen interpretation of QM so popular? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]HugodeCrevellier 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Maybe that binary (on/off) is not the right way to understand existence at quantum scales. The quantum realm seems to be a kind of sea of virtual events, which we call 'particles' but probably shouldn't. More helpful analogies may exist than billiard balls. For example, is a wave top/crest in the sea a distinct thing, fully separate from the surrounding water? Where does it begin, and where does it end?

A New Experiment Casts Doubt on the Leading Theory of the Nucleus by [deleted] in Physics

[–]gouride 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's a bit strange

A New Experiment Casts Doubt on the Leading Theory of the Nucleus by [deleted] in Physics

[–]qunide 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

cool

A New Experiment Casts Doubt on the Leading Theory of the Nucleus by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Didn't I ?

A New Experiment Casts Doubt on the Leading Theory of the Nucleus by [deleted] in Physics

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

cope

Physicists detect a hybrid particle held together by uniquely intense “glue” by zyxzevn in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

;-) .

Physicists detect a hybrid particle held together by uniquely intense “glue” by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

No doubt about it.

A New Experiment Casts Doubt on the Leading Theory of the Nucleus by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

She stretches "simple" a lot. I get that you don't are into these matters, like I am. That is why you can't get her flavor of irony.

It never ain't simple (to understand). Especially her field is hard to get a grasp on, once you actually did some math.

God basically is a justification. As such a general assumption itself, easily refutable, especially when put into a sound context.

But I run in front of my timeframe, while some other patients here rather cite some ancient bs.

I get your gist.

A New Experiment Casts Doubt on the Leading Theory of the Nucleus by [deleted] in Physics

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We still don’t have a solid theoretical grasp of even the simplest nuclear systems.

The bible believing chad laughs at the atheistcel. God holds everything together like its literally that simple LOL

Physicists detect a hybrid particle held together by uniquely intense “glue” by zyxzevn in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you do believe this never happened up until now ?

Where do electrons get energy to spin around an atom's nucleus? by zyxzevn in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Memories. Makes me feel nostalgic.

Sometimes you need to look at smthg. to actually be able to remember, you studied it (felt) millennia way back.

Let's build a voltage multiplier! - Ben Eater by zyxzevn in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A classic. Observable physics I mostly remember as fun.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Consider geodetics. The "main" topic of any undergrad lecture on differential geometry to support your arguments.

If you then look at these differential moments of different orders (kappa and tau, fyi) of these functions it is relatively doable to understand, why you can't sense these changes in "every day"-life.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Discovered. Mathematics itself "doesn't know time". Surely the nature of time and how to put it into calculations and proofs. But mathematics itself (an educator of mine always spoke of "inner-mathematical" problems to refute anything off-topic or beside the thought considered) as a "scaffolding" for thoughts and ideas doesn't know time in a dimensional sense.

World’s Largest Fusion Project Is in Big Trouble, New Documents Reveal by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sry to write this, but these kinds of problems are anything but new.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

force is balanced and the any effect is canceled out

movement force pulling outward

and gravity inward

Making Graphene could KILL you... but we did it anyway?! - Tech Ingredients by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I remember long ago hearing that kids who sucked on the graphite 'lead' pencils a lot had it invade their gum/tooth interfaces and ruin their teeth

How colors change as you go deeper underwater by JasonCarswell in Physics

[–]twolanterns 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

how light from the surface changes due to depth filtering

by the 82 feet all but blue should be gone

Is Physics Philosophy? - Unzicker by zyxzevn in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Srsly ? Do i need to watch a video to give an answer to a question as trivial as this one ?

How colors change as you go deeper underwater by JasonCarswell in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Remarkably simple. Fitting the time and brains living in it. I like it.

Who's Ahead in the Fusion Energy Race? by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Sun is way ahead of them all.

Who's Ahead in the Fusion Energy Race? by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Note: The reason I post this funding request, is that the video makes it clear how much ahead this project is compared to well funded projects.

Rethinking the Universe: Astronomers Disturbed by the Unexpected Scale of James Webb's Galaxies by hfxB0oyA in Physics

[–]chadwickofwv 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When every new piece of evidence conflicts with your model, it isn't time to alter the model. It's time to throw it out completely, along with everything based upon it.

How to take admission to India’s medical colleges and list of medical colleges in India by education_2023 in Physics

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

if it has the word "medical" that means drug doctor who kills people with drugs to pay off the debt incurred from medical brainwashing

Wire EDM is an insanely precise manufacturing method. But there's a trick behind this objects that appear to have no seam. (How these impossibly thin cuts are made - Steve Mould) by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The trick is: a quarter-million dollar machine and knowing how to use it!

HyperPhysics - Collection of mathematical equations with calculator by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is a great overview of formulas. Often with a calculator.

There is also HyperMath

For more complex stuff, like complicated integrals, I would advice https://www.wolframalpha.com/

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Astronomy is different. It should look more at the sun and planets instead of making up theories about dark matter.
A lot of the mainstream astronomy is about making up stuff.

I have a long article on astronomy that has a more practical approach, using ideas from plasmacosmology.
Link here
And I think it would be more in line with your practical way of thinking.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They had empirical knowledge accumulated in the library of Alexandria.

This knowledge was preserved from before the cataclysm, which ended the antediluvian iceage era civilization. This civilization also built the pyramids and the sphinx (which could not have been built by dynastic Egyptians, who had bronze tools, and fought wars on chariots with wooden wheels.

Plato studied at the library, and refers to the cataclysm flood event, which occurred +9000 years before his time. Plato also refers to more advanced civilizations like Atlantis, etc.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So we only see order in the universe because we are part of the universe?

I would argue yes. There's no concept of order without someone to observe and define it. Otherwise, things just exist without appreciation. But at the same time, the definition of order comes from the fact that things (atoms, planets, life) evolved to result in us. So I think order is a very real thing, but it's also a chicken and egg situation where there is no concept of order without intelligence and there is no intelligence without the order to give rise to it.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why does some Ancient Greek mathematics apply to find true phenomenon today, even before the Novus Organum? They were not empiricists, testing their ideas against the real world.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How could Einstein work out general relativity before he could confirm it and have the universe agree?

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We see pinpricks of lights in the sky that we cannot actually travel to. Deduce all sort of things based on what we know on earth. Are the principle of astronomy knowledge or hypothesis? they would have to be the latter if our axioms do not apply.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So we only see order in the universe because we are part of the universe?

Is this order we see real or is it just us being delusional?

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]TemporarilyDeceased 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Math is explanatory and used to convey meaning. This is the same way we use language. We don't assume that because the universe can be explained using the English language that whomever created the universe is a native English speaker.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why does physical space conform to geometric axioms?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Axiom

An axiom, postulate, or assumption is a statement that is taken to be true, to serve as a premise or starting point for further reasoning and arguments.

An infinite number of axioms exist that are meaningless, and have no basis in reality.

The scientific method is designed to tease out the axioms that work the best; given the measurable circumstances, and political atmosphere.

Scientific evidence that isn't politically supported is generally ignored, or ridiculed; if it's significant and may lead to a paradigm shift in understanding.

Politics and financial control of the of academic institutions is the obstacle to actual advancement.

Why does trigonometry predict what would really happen instead of the universe behaving in unpredictable ways?

Geometry Trigonometry is a method of dimensionality mapping out physical features.

It's only accurate as a predictive tool to the extent that the assumptions and variables selected match physical reality. Garbage in; garbage out.

We benefit from centuries of scientific guess and test improvements. Most of which failed.

Geometric characteristics that match the behavior of the physical world have been cherry picked from the garbage, and that's what it's taught in schools. Mostly.

There's still plenty of garbage, not so much in geometry.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The physical world is 3D space filled with things. And in the world certain things are constant and in balance.
A lot of maths in physics comes from conservation of mass, conservation of energy, conservation of momentum, etc.
In theory we can also make things more perfect than they really are, and this makes the maths work better.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]chadwickofwv 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That's because it is a religious belief.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If we're made of the stuff of the universe, then it might go to figure that the thoughts on our heads are fundamentally connected to the mechanics of the universe that we are a part of. So in a way, whether there is an intelligence behind it or not, we are influenced by our creator.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I suppose materialists would have no choice but to say invented because mathematical concepts are not made of matter, energy or information and yet are universal.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Is 2 + 2 =5 in Pluto? Why not, if math is a human construct or if the cause of the universe is irrational forces? Why should the universe agree with our thoughts if it is all in our heads? And if the laws are not just in our heads, what are they made of?

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]Zapped 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Was mathematics invented or discovered?

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Big Bang dosent even make sense.

If nothing rational designed the universe, and math is the invention of men, why does physical space behave like a mathematical space? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]hfxB0oyA 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Confirmation bias. Our understanding of the math that underlies and explains the way things work can give us the sense that if it took a sentient being to figure it out, another sentient being must have created it. I say this as an agnostic and someone who is open to the idea of a supreme intelligence.

I'd really like this sub to stop posting videos, rather do some "real" Hamiltonian's instead by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

e.g. . I correct myself by appending an ", e.g." at the end of this post into your imagination.

How colors change as you go deeper underwater by JasonCarswell in Physics

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And yellow.

But not uniformly.

How colors change as you go deeper underwater by JasonCarswell in Physics

[–]ShoahKahn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's the RED that's being saturated out.

How colors change as you go deeper underwater by JasonCarswell in Physics

[–]BISH 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

That's really interesting.

I wouldn't have guessed that would happen.

I'd really like this sub to stop posting videos, rather do some "real" Hamiltonian's instead by [deleted] in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In this sub I was focusing on education and getting people interested.
Too many people do not even know the basics of physics.

Feel free to propose some theoretical work.
But I found quite a lot of errors in theoretical physics, which made me focus more on observations instead of bad maths.

Since magnetic materials have microcurrents can these currents be extracted as an electricity source? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What "microcurrents" do you mean?
The currents that maintain static magnetic fields are locked in the crystal structure.
They disappear as soon the material is heated (above Curie temperature).
And it costs energy to get them magnetic again |(via a strong external magnetic field)..

Since magnetic materials have microcurrents can these currents be extracted as an electricity source? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, use the magnetic force to cause mechanical movement, then convert that to electricity via an alternator, voila! presto change-o!

Source: I identify as a physicist as well as a magician. The Incredible Dr. Phooey is a man of many talents 🤹‍♂️

Making Graphene could KILL you... but we did it anyway?! - Tech Ingredients by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

great vid

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There is no air resistance and barely any matter in outer space. No speed is too fast for the planet to hold up, unless there's a collision.

The speed around the sun is (almost) constant, you have to remember that there's no up and down in outer space. The planet revolves around its center point due to weak gravity.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]ID10T 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Lol damn I almost believe you really believe that nonsense

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]iDontShift 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

you mean like those shows that they point out all the shit i never even thought of an pretend like it is what flatearthers have been pointing out for years, but really it is some bogus made-up bullshit.

do experiments to prove the earth is flat. Experiments that they came up with.

experiments think tanks came up with that your dumbass would believe

the real proofs are listed above and will never be on your shows

the moon lander is smaller than you think, the astroNOT models at the smithsonian are 4 1/2 foot tall to make it look like they could actually fit inside

oh, the list of ballearth fallacies that any flat earther would point out is hilariously avoided.

gryoscope can be setup to spin continuously for over twenty-four hours and never move

WE ARE NOT MOVING and your entire life is a lie propagated by lies learned on youtube

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That’s fine.

But what are we getting at?

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That your mistake was assuming I am a flat earther because I asked this question.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Magnetism? Gravity? What does hold in our atmosphere?

This is over my head.

What is your point? Like what are we getting at?

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]weavilsatemyface 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If it’s one constant speed, why are we accelerating.

It takes a force to either change speed, or change direction. That force causes an acceleration. So even if the speed is the same, there is an acceleration. We call speed + direction "velocity" so any change in velocity (whether the speed, or direction, or both) counts as acceleration.

pseudo forces

I don’t know anything about this.

There are real forces, like friction, gravity, magnetism, tension, pushes and pulls; and then there are pseudo forces. For example, when you are in a car travelling at high speed, and you turn left, you will feel a force pushing you to the right. This is a pseudo force, because it's not real. There is a real force on the car, pushing it to the left (the friction on the tires). The force pushes the car to the left. But people and objects inside the car want to keep travelling in a straight line. So from their perspective, it feels like something is pushing them towards the right side of the car. But that's just an illusion -- its actually that the car is moving to the left while they are moving forward.

Good demonstrations of why centripetal forces are real but centrifugal forces are fictitious or pseudo forces:

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Since velocity is a vector (has both direction and magnitude) going at constant speed in a circle means you are always changing the direction, hence the velocity. So it is accelerating.

I’m not a flat earther, but the intuition contradicts the math. If we went by intuition we would wonder what holds the atmosphere together.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is the correct answer. I bit the bullet and calculated it and it is less than 1/100 m/s*s.

Still cool that it means that g in the far side of earth is slightly smaller.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]weavilsatemyface 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun?

You don't feel the force of the earth's rotation because it is way too small to notice. The force of the Earth's rotation around the sun would be hundreds of times smaller.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I understand what you are saying, only a little bit.

I would have to look all this up:

Principal of Relativity

Makes sense

Circular or Elliptical Motion

I know nothing

Centripetal Acceleration

If it’s one constant speed, why are we accelerating. This doesn’t make sense to me.

pseudo forces

I don’t know anything about this.

which natural phenomenon are cause by them.

I don’t know, I dont know anything about them.

rotation, Coralis forces; asking about revolution

I know nothing.

Here’s what I do know:

We have GPS. We have airplanes. We have cellphones. We have satellite imagery. Why are they lying to us?

I’m happy to have a conversation about these things. I’m willing to keep an open ear. And I know about the glass dome theory. Like the firmament? Or what’s it called, in the Bible?

Feel free to share what you know. I often look stuff up in google and don’t require citations. I love to learn.

But I am very skeptical of flat earth and the dome.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I’m sorry I assumed you were a physicist.

Yes, it is called the principle of relativity. If you travel with a constant linear velocity you can not tell the difference other than looking at the background. But that would be assuming there is no air resistance. But a circular or elliptical motion has a centripetal acceleration, so you would experience psuedo forces. If we do experience them on Earth, which natural phenomenon are caused by them? Rotation of earth explains Coralis forces, but I am asking about revolution.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]ID10T 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dude 🤦

I like those shows where flat earthers do experiments to prove the earth is flat. Experiments that they came up with. And they, of course, always prove the earth is round, with their own experiments. And yet these freaks still mange to double down, and think of some other crazy reason why their experiment didn't really prove the earth is round. Y'all wild! But you really need to let go of this foolishness.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You are saying that if you are moving constantly, no jolts, no bumps, you don’t notice it? This is like, moving through space?

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–]UncleWillard56 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You are not a smart person.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You tell me, physicist san. My guess is that we are moving in a constant linear velocity for most of the trip and because of friction and seat belts when we aren't.

Why don't we feel the centrifugal force of Earth's revolution around the sun? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why don’t you feel like your moving in a car, or in an airplane?