Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]SoCo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's probably all a matter of time. The body regulates its own temperature and can withstand some impressive extremes, for a short period of time. The bodies of children under 4 (and the elderly) cannot do this as well. Also, to withstand extreme heat, humans and dogs, need to be well hydrated.

Shit parents and shit dog owners, likely have insufficiently hydrated children/dogs while out and about.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]hfxB0oyA 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

On hot days, I open my car and it's not uncommon to see a few dead insects on the dash. If it can kill those critters, I wouldn't put a mammal in there.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]Dr_Bukkake 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When someone leaves their kid/pet in a hot car, they have to open the door to get out. So it isn't any different.

When they shut the door and the car sits it heats back up. It’s like opening your oven door, it cools down because you let the a lot of the heat out but when you close the door it heats up again.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]Dr_Bukkake 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When you opened the door you let the heat out so you were likely sitting in a 90 degree car and not the 130-170 degrees a car that’s been sitting in the sun all day can get up to. Trust me, the next 90 degree day sit in your car for a few hours and you will likely die.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It's probably exaggerated. I remember one incident where temperatures were in the low 70s and someone busted a car window to let a dog out. I thought that was borderline. Just seemed like someone wanting to play hero.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]ID10T 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unlikely you completely shut off the vents while driving, which would pull outside air in to cool it. Just opening the door to get inside will cool the car quite a bit. If you want to see what happens when the car is parked in the sun without driving, put a thermometer in the car and park it in the sun and see how hot it gets. I don't recommend actually sitting inside and trying it out for yourself, because you could actually pass out and die before you realize it.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=child+dies+in+hot+car&t=ffab&ia=web

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]trident765[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The moving air dramatically cools the temperature,

Movement of air does not cool. Displacing the surrounding warm air does. But I have never felt that the air surrounding a hot car is especially warmer than the atmosphere.

and even opening the door lets out a lot of heat.

When someone leaves their kid/pet in a hot car, they have to open the door to get out. So it isn't any different.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]Melodic_Programmer 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No worries

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]SMCAB 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Like I said, I genuinely apologize for being harsh.

I have an issue with obfuscation, and what you said isn't necessarily that, unless I'm being pissy.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Cars can get up to 160F here in the summer. They're like ovens, you can actually make dashboard cookies (https://www.survivopedia.com/how-to-use-your-car-for-cooking/). The moving air dramatically cools the temperature, and even opening the door lets out a lot of heat. They sometimes call it 4/55 AC, 4 windows open at 55mph.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]Melodic_Programmer 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Lol, calm down. All you have to do is roll down the windows if you take your dog shopping, nibba. Then again, I don't live in a desert.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]SMCAB 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Okay.

Since we're talking about leaving dogs in a hot car here, did I need to talk about a dogs preference of riding in a car?

How about this, dog whisperer? If you're going to have to park and leave your dog in a hot car, LEAVE YOUR FUCKING DOG AT HOME. Did I have to really differentiate whether someone is taking a joyride or going shopping? No I didn't. Because the former doesn't lead to your dog being locked in a hot car.

Did you have a point, seeing as we said the same thing?

Sorry for being a dick, but Jesus, this is exhausting.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]Melodic_Programmer 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Dogs prefer going places with their owners instead of being left at home, and many enjoy car rides. Obviously you shouldn't lock them in a hot car though.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]Melodic_Programmer 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I would imagine most adult humans can handle 15 minutes of incubating like that just fine. My boyfriend's dad has a story about getting piss ass drunk and passing out in a car in the middle of summer, woke up absolutely soaked in sweat, like he'd just taken a dip in a pool.

Just, ya know, don't leave your babies or dogs in there.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]SMCAB 6 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

No, children and dogs die when left in them. You certainly cooled the car, and the air in the car, by driving it.

What I don't understand is, why do people leave their dogs in a car, you know, they have the totally easy option of LEAVING THE FUCKING DOG AT HOME. It isn't an accessory.

Is the thing about hot cars being exceptionally deadly a myth? by trident765 in Physics

[–]IkeConn 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Here in the US South it is very real and kids die every Summer to prove it.

Strange new phase of matter created in quantum computer acts like it has two time dimensions by GeorgeCarlin in Physics

[–]CreditKnifeMan 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The Penrose tiling pattern is a type of quasicrystal, which means that it has an ordered yet never-repeating structure. The pattern, composed of two shapes, is a 2D projection of a 5D square lattice. Credit: None

A 5D square lattice!!!

...And nobody want credit for it?

;-)

By shining a laser pulse sequence inspired by the Fibonacci numbers at atoms inside a quantum computer.

Laser pulses, and Fibonacci, and atoms in a quantum computer???

They scienced their asses off!

Strange new phase of matter created in quantum computer acts like it has two time dimensions by GeorgeCarlin in Physics

[–]chottohen 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I asked if there are two time lines then maybe obe moves forward in time, as we tend to experience it, and the other goes back into the past. At least one physicist has said there is no particularly good reason that we experience time as moving into the future. Maybe they can reverse me.

Strange new phase of matter created in quantum computer acts like it has two time dimensions by GeorgeCarlin in Physics

[–]Bridgeheadprod 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What does it mean?

Strange new phase of matter created in quantum computer acts like it has two time dimensions by GeorgeCarlin in Physics

[–]IridescentAnaconda 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Not so much two time dimensions but rather the application of a conventional-time quasicrystal that is the projection from a two-dimensional proper crystal. I'm not sure what is meant by "acting like". But whatever it's impressive that they were able to achieve 5-fold extension of stability duration.

Strange new phase of matter created in quantum computer acts like it has two time dimensions by GeorgeCarlin in Physics

[–]chottohen 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One forward and one back?

How To Make Infrared Cooling Paint (Electricity Free Air Conditioning) by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]FuckYourMom 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

That is very cool.

The LHC's Record Energy at CERN Will Just Produce Record Nonsense - Unzicker's Real Physics by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]Jong56 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

'Free energy promises, meet the laws of thermodynamics. You guys are going to hit it off!'

It was obvious when they launched the original LHC. Anyone who comprehends the content in a basic physics class could see the ridiculous amount of energy contributions required to spin an electron free AND then suspend in within a giant yet precise electromagnetic field indefinitely, would never net a positive energy output.

Nonlinear optics with structured light by zyxzevn in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

complex, quick computational problems that today's electronic computational platforms can't manage effectively or as well in a similar amount of time.

Well yeah, it would be an analog computer and that has a number of advantages such as solving matrixes quickly.

Nonlinear optics with structured light by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]Spocks 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And make laser amplifiers, ultra-short pulsed lasers, better sensors for ultrafast switches, and optical signal processing in general. As for analogue optical computers, they use nonlinear optics and photonics to manage complex, quick computational problems that today's electronic computational platforms can't manage effectively or as well in a similar amount of time. The research developed in the mid-1990s and picked up pace significantly a few years ago.

Nonlinear optics with structured light by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

In filmmaking you can put gels, filters, screens, shades, and barn doors on lights to specifically add light or control the absence of light, but you cannot go negative - unless using computer animated negative lights that darken (like casting shadows) for normal virtual and special lighting setups (for optical effects such as x-rays). Pondering a real-world negative light may lead to interesting thought-experiments.

Nonlinear optics with structured light by zyxzevn in Physics

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nonlinear optics with structured light by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]GeorgeCarlin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Coolest subsaidit so far. In a vicinity of 0 Kelvin, most def.

Einstein's Best Idea: Variable Speed of Light - The History - Unzicker's Real Physics by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]Feldheld 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Great channel.

Newton's Pendulum (Gangnam Style) by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]GeorgeCarlin 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Finally something creative...

Null-Hypothesis - Quantum mechanics shows that there are no photons by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

My reply to theoretical physics expert.

Quantum entanglement for babies: https://saidit.net/media/cL2JTPz2a96-NsM_HN78ykzJRRTxqLlloBxqwY9Nsd0.jpg

I wonder why Plank's loader model is always avoided. It is the simplest solution. It has no invisible magic. Actually, in experiments we see that it works better.

Explained: Modernized Plank's loader model: Threshold model. Quantum model that has no particles: Instead it uses "loop locked waves" to store energy and state. Like we see in super conductors, where loops of electric current store magnetic flux "particles".

Using energy storage with loops creates thresholds, which then replace the "measurement". Energy quanta are transferred via resonance instead of particles in a collapsing wave. So in this model the locked wave goes up in energy state, instead of the wave function goes down in state.

Example: in normal QM one would model ONE photon particle hitting a pixel-sensor of the camera. Now we have a light-wave of ONE "photon" hitting all pixel-sensors of the camera, and the sensors that reach a certain energy threshold get activated. On average exactly one. In most cameras you can change the threshold level of the sensors via the ISO settings. So this concept is already well integrated in our technology.

The observations are only slightly different, except for high energy particles. In those cases you will find more often multiple quanta detections, or none at all. As if 2 quantum particles were suddenly present. And indeed experiments with high energy quanta do show this phenomenon. So you do not get quantum magic, nor bad science. I dont know exactly, they are often observed with superconductors.. But it is a bit like asking how magnetism exist, and probably has the same answer.

Newton's Pendulum (Gangnam Style) by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]vaginacologist 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

awesome

Newton's Pendulum (Gangnam Style) by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]chottohen 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

For every action, there is an equal and opposite over-reaction.

W boson seems to be about 1 part in 1000 heavier than it's supposed to be. Standard model might be due for revision by infocom6502 in Physics

[–]infocom6502[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i wish I knew. The article says there was an earlier experiment/paper which also points to the standard model being off, and the authors speculated that it could point to another force.

This recent measurement is consistent with this earlier paper. So the it's a sign to take those author's suggestion seriously.

W boson seems to be about 1 part in 1000 heavier than it's supposed to be. Standard model might be due for revision by infocom6502 in Physics

[–]Tiwaking 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

However, in the physics community, the joy is tempered with a strong note of caution. Although the Fermilab result is the most precise measurement of the W boson mass to date, it contradicts two of the next most precise readings from two other experiments, both of which are consistent with the Standard Model.

It would be nice if the W boson was a source for a new particle

W boson seems to be about 1 part in 1000 heavier than it's supposed to be. Standard model might be due for revision by infocom6502 in Physics

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How does a new force explain the difference in readings?

W boson seems to be about 1 part in 1000 heavier than it's supposed to be. Standard model might be due for revision by infocom6502 in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Well shit. Do I have any of these bosons in my body? How would you even know you had bosons? Do you have bosons?

W boson seems to be about 1 part in 1000 heavier than it's supposed to be. Standard model might be due for revision by infocom6502 in Physics

[–]infocom6502[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The findings, which were published in the journal Science, could be linked to suggestions from previous Fermilab and Large Hadron Collider investigations on the Swiss-French border. These as-yet-unconfirmed findings also point to deviations from the Standard Model, presumably due to the presence of an as-yet-undiscovered fifth natural force.

There's a lot of boson scratching their heads at collider campuses these days.

"Real magic" - is it possible for human consciousness to directly influence or manipulate our physical reality? Dean Radin is a senior scientist at the Institute of Noetic Science who has documented many experiments suggesting this may be the case. What say you? by the-swerve-podcast in Physics

[–]the-swerve-podcast[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hoping more in depth studies continue to be done in this area. Very fringe science, but some of the results make one wonder if we are missing something big.

Your ... found to be significantly smaller than scientists previously thought by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I try to fill those tiny holes in knowledge with a long article of hard science.

Your ... found to be significantly smaller than scientists previously thought by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]Tiwaking 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun - 43 minutes ago Great clickbate.

I hope you get that job on buzzfeed.

Hey man dont knock honest hard work at Buzzfeed. They make dozens of dollars!
Dozens!

Your ... found to be significantly smaller than scientists previously thought by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Great clickbate.

I hope you get that job on buzzfeed.

Your ... found to be significantly smaller than scientists previously thought by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Your "protons" are found to be smaller. Not your mom, though.

Electromagnetic explanation of gravity? by trident765 in Physics

[–]Cornfed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Perhaps we would be better to assume that gravity doesn't exist at all given that it is an entirely mystical contrivance and start from scratch explaining why objects denser than their medium tend to sink.

"Real magic" - is it possible for human consciousness to directly influence or manipulate our physical reality? Dean Radin is a senior scientist at the Institute of Noetic Science who has documented many experiments suggesting this may be the case. What say you? by the-swerve-podcast in Physics

[–]Cornfed 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These phenomena have long since been proven to exist. The question is how do they work and how can we harness them.

Animation: Using Planets to Visualize the Speed of Light by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

When you see the speed of light up against the solar system it seems pathetically slow. Kind of like how a C-5 Galaxy cruising at 500 knots looks like it is standing still.

Why Does Buttered Toast Fall Face Down? by RupertTaylor493 in Physics

[–]Cornfed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Probably the height of the average table is good for one flip.

Electromagnetic explanation of gravity? by trident765 in Physics

[–]GeorgeCarlin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Exactly. Actual science. Not this bs they try to sell as science.

Electromagnetic explanation of gravity? by trident765 in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

More weird symbols = more science!!

Electromagnetic explanation of gravity? by trident765 in Physics

[–]GeorgeCarlin 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We just need a new little equation. Most certainly containing an integral sign, Imo.

Why Does Buttered Toast Fall Face Down? by RupertTaylor493 in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I put a lot of butter on my bread so for me it's a matter of weight distribution.

Time is Not a Spatial Dimension There Are Only 3 Dimensions by trident765 in Physics

[–]rainwater 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So what answer you actually looking for ?

Time-Space, e.g. Maxwell's Tensor at first seems hard to understand.

But once you got it, it actually is easy, math-wise speaking. Don't morph a bee into robot.

Physicists detect a hybrid particle held together by uniquely intense “glue” by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This "glue" is used in similar sense as "gluons'. So it is like a particle, or pseudo-particle.

Physicists detect a hybrid particle held together by uniquely intense “glue” by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]filbs111 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The thing that is all too often glossed over but still incredible is that they managed to make glue that small.

Physicists detect a hybrid particle held together by uniquely intense “glue” by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

One day they are going to look at a new particle and it's going to look back.

Physicists detect a hybrid particle held together by uniquely intense “glue” by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

With far less science fiction.
The paper:
Magnetically brightened dark electron-phonon bound states in a van der Waals antiferromagnet
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-27741-3

In van der Waals (vdW) materials, strong coupling between different degrees of freedom can hybridize elementary excitations into bound states with mixed character1–3. Correctly identifying the nature and composition of these bound states is key to understanding their ground state properties and excitation spectra4,5. Here, we use ultrafast spectroscopy to reveal bound states of d-orbitals and phonons in 2D vdW antiferromagnet NiPS3. These bound states manifest themselves through equally spaced phonon replicas in frequency domain. These states are optically dark above the Néel temperature and become accessible with magnetic order. By launching this phonon and spectrally tracking its amplitude, we establish the electronic origin of bound states as localized d–d excitations. Our data directly yield electron-phonon coupling strength which exceeds the highest known value in 2D systems6. These results demonstrate NiPS3 as a platform to study strong interactions between spins, orbitals and lattice, and open pathways to coherent control of 2D magnets.

A biography of high school teacher Georg Ohm. How Ohm wrote his law, why it was hated and how it become accepted in scientific communities. by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Electical engineers are glad to this day his last name wasn't Scheckleburger.

How close is nuclear fusion power? by zyxzevn in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

once, in a galaxy far far away.

It isn't near. Not even close.With all my honesty. to my new bff https://saidit.net/user/zyxzevn

I read all their shit. The actual chinese reactor that just now flew down the memory hole is also fake.

How to ham-radio auroras by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Since encrypted stuff is all forbidden by my BSI, i REALLY like this book.

Get a copy now !!!

Imagine a electroneutral substance, a fluid with standard conditions. Filled with "free" neutrons to the hat. by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

blup.

A Critical History of Quantum Mechanics and Wave-Particle Duality by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]FlippyKing 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've seen other people talk about how the sequence of the experiments and events and all that influenced the conclusions drawn and which conclusions. It's fascinating to think how the ordering of information impacts the assessment of it.

A Critical History of Quantum Mechanics and Wave-Particle Duality by zyxzevn in Physics

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The speaker explains how each scientists made certain assumptions and errors.
He explains why the Loader theory is likely a better model.

The Loader theory is about the energy of the light spreading evenly via waves, and not via a packet (photon).

What is often called a "detection of a photon" is actually the conversion of electromagnetic energy into electricity.
This detection seems to follow a step, but also rises after that.
The step seems to have a threshold with a random energy starting position.

With a threshold, there is no need to use photon-packets.
And still everything else of the quantum world works very similar.
The experiments that investigate differences,
show that the threshold predicts the correct results,
and not the theory of quantum mechanics.

It could be presented a lot better, but this is an engineer speaking, not an actor.

Imagine a electroneutral substance, a fluid with standard conditions. Filled with "free" neutrons to the hat. by [deleted] in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds like heavy water.

CERN is Utilizing the Large Hadron Collider to Open 'Bottomless Pit' of the Revelation 9 Prophecy by thelight in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I hope they don't accidentally create a black hole that devours the planet. That would piss off all the people counting on a slow collapse.

CERN is Utilizing the Large Hadron Collider to Open 'Bottomless Pit' of the Revelation 9 Prophecy by thelight in Physics

[–]hennaojichan 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The first sentence is incorrect. CERN is located partly in Switzerland and partly in France.

CERN is Utilizing the Large Hadron Collider to Open 'Bottomless Pit' of the Revelation 9 Prophecy by thelight in Physics

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Cool

Hit me. I got my engineer back. MY ENGINEER. IN FACT I travel at the speed of light. Try. ONCE. by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hit me.

Try.

I'm so fucking fast:

TRY Again.

Carly Rae Jepsen - Call Me Maybe I PHASE dimensions. Time especiallly. WANNA touch me? by [deleted] in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i CAN jump back, With one guest, maybe,

Electromagnetic explanation of gravity? by trident765 in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yawn. We KNOW all this and there are things beyond string-theory.

Usually it is YOUR kind of people starting to vomit.

Wanna indict me? Well, good luck,

Time is Not a Spatial Dimension There Are Only 3 Dimensions by trident765 in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So i answer myself: Because MY BODY is only part of MY REALITY.

The indestructible part isn't measurable at all.

They called me. Not i them.

It even isn't arrest able, if i start to phase. In-between.

But if i am forced to do that, it gets nerdy. Quite quirky even. Because i can "jump" with the impulse.

Ever got hit by a train? Wanna? Arrest me.

And the 3-dimension argument gets put to dust.

Where it belongs.

Dimensions live on a logarithmic scale. If this dries your bone.

Time is Not a Spatial Dimension There Are Only 3 Dimensions by trident765 in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wrong.

Just answer one question: Why do i look young even-though i am old ?

Time is Not a Spatial Dimension There Are Only 3 Dimensions by trident765 in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mr. Know It All

Time is Not a Spatial Dimension There Are Only 3 Dimensions by trident765 in Physics

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This guy simply doesn't understand the purpose of science. The purpose of science is to create theories/models that have predictive value. The question of what is a real is a philosophical question, not a scientific question. And on this question, I side with the Old Testament against Plato in saying that the theories/models or what is in our mind is all we have and to talk about reality in an absolute sense is just nonsense. Plato's concept of absolute truth is fundamentally a religious concept that the Old Testament lacks. So the Old Testament is closer to pure science than western philosophy is.

Physics Lie: Particle Wave Duality by trident765 in Physics

[–]fschmidt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What? Sorry but no. There is no medium for the same reason that the old idea of "ether" doesn't work. There is no absolute frame of reference which a medium would imply.

The further we get from our natural scale, the less the natural concepts of our minds work. All we can do is to model things using our natural concepts. In the case of quantum mechanics, the model I find most satisfying is this one. But this is purely a model, no medium required.

Time is Not a Spatial Dimension There Are Only 3 Dimensions by trident765 in Physics

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A dimension not only of sight and sound, but of mind.

Physics Lie: Particle Wave Duality by trident765 in Physics

[–]IkeConn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mr. Know It All

Time is Not a Spatial Dimension There Are Only 3 Dimensions by trident765 in Physics

[–]iDontShift 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

tesla said ether is, instant transmission is possible

einstein said no, nothing is faster than light

quantum physics has entangled particles which allow instant transmission

tesla was right, einstein is a fraud .. lets start fixing things

Time is Not a Spatial Dimension There Are Only 3 Dimensions by trident765 in Physics

[–]aaarrgh 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Look closely, there is a 4th dimension.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]sproketboy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why don't you put some more jews in the oven then?

The Failure of the Uncertainty Principle by nathanrapport in Physics

[–]aintyouaintI 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Still...

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]aintyouaintI 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mostly tech is invented by Germans. Then all your US-american asses come and try to monopolize it.

You know what ? 98 % of times your are sucking me off anyway. We are the "go to guys" in tech. I'm 39 right now and mostly imo you can jerk yourself off. I got a diploma in math. What in fact is your excuse?

Of course i need a team of engineers to help me. To advise me.

I'm a fucking German. As long as my foreman stays the same, i will build it. I'm home at math; So of course i need a team. I never will ignore well placed advice. From engineers.

The Finns signed a contract (18 years ago: AND NO: I'm not Siemens) and they got me.I'm their asset because i'm the only guy on this construction that actually can explain what is happening.

Because i know survey, construction and physics(math not to mention), all the same basically:

Better than you.They payed. They get their money's worth. I'm always well payed, maybe somehow you don't realize how this one is actually in Europe.

We will build this shit. But everyone knows it is shit. And every worker i meet, i tell.

They can't afford sacking me.

In fact i started very small. As a surveyor.

No war ends or stops without surveyors. But y'all are so fucking smart.

Find some water.... :) In desert environments.

I know... a lot of shit.

Electromagnetic explanation of gravity? by trident765 in Physics

[–]Canbot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Explain why there are different effects of electromagnetism on objects with different properties but gravity acts on all of them exactly the same.

Electromagnetic explanation of gravity? by trident765 in Physics

[–]zyxzevn 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The interesting thing of Electromagnetism is that it is an extreme strong force,
while gravity is an extreme weak force.
For this reason it is easy to find some models in which (Newton's) gravity
seems to be some direct consequence of electromagnetism.

The main problem is that electromagnetic forces are all related to charge.
Objects connected to earth will have the same charge,
and thus have no electromagnetic force between them.

A dielectric force that is sometimes proposed is even 1/R4,
and we already know that as van-der-Waals force.
Tesla described it as a magnetic force, but we can see with super-conductors that it works different.

And that is usually the point with these theories:
We already see these electromagnetic forces in nature in a different way.
You can use electric charge to levitate small objects.

Additionally the total sum of charge of a planetary object is around zero.
And if we look at the sun, a planet and its moons, all three would need different charges.
And different moons would repel each other.

Where may we find electromagnetism in relation with gravity?

I do think that electromagnetism has influence in the stabilization of the orbits of planets and their moons.
The dust rings around Saturn are likely of one charge, making the the dust-particles repel each other.

We can also see that the Sun is very electrically active.
We see huge electrical currents, showing very strong magnetic fields (0.1 Tesla)
We also see electrical plasma outbursts and electrical turbulence in the solar wind.

What about the nucleus?

Inside a nucleus we see very strong positive charged protons,
but they do not repel each other.
In the standard model we use a different force to describe that.
But what if this nucleus is locked up in a separate dimension,
where the space around it is limited. And where the electrical force works different.

The amount of protons and neutrons describe the mass of an object. So this separate dimension or locking system could potentially be related to gravity.

And we can also see something similar with how
Heisenberg's uncertainty principle can already give us a description of gravity. Explained here

Electromagnetic explanation of gravity? by trident765 in Physics

[–]trident765[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Most of the every day forces we encounter are ultimately electromagnetic forces, even though we might think of them as being mechanical forces. Examples include: Friction, collisions, and almost all other contact forces. The only forces I can think of that are not ultimately electromagnetic are the force of gravity and the subatomic forces. So I wonder if in reality there is an electromagnetic explanation for gravity that can replace the "bending of the fabric of space and time" crap.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]lessalarming 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

The "reactor" is big-tech and it is only making radicals like it had in the 1970s

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]lessalarming 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sadly, that is "family." And teaching of all that free radical information. Our own history taught back to the country's pioneers as radicals. As the "nuclear" energy that formed the nation, the Western heritage and families of today, now believe in "containment" of nuclear families and bringing in new "energy sources"

That American's are self-sufficient has to be controlled and taught that they need "supervision," otherwise a radical meltdown like 3 mile island may occurr. Which they engineered.

The powers that be...is exactly what is happening, they have to be "depended upon"...they want to be the "Nuclear energy" of the future.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

TPTB need us to be dependent on their controlled sources of power.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]lessalarming 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Now we can't contain the free radicals

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]lessalarming 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Our most popular President, and our most popular energy solution where both locked up like Uranium.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]lessalarming 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Biden is the Nuclear Plan..."Blow Up" America...Madonna reference to blow up the White House. Which she wasn't wrong about.

Except we don't have an "Alex Jones" Operation's Northwood's leek on this "building" attack.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]lessalarming 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You can also see the corollary's to ANTI Nuclear in the 70's with BLM today. We had the know how and the means to make more Efficient Nuclear energy and make America energy independent.

We even had Thorium in our back pocket and a stockpile reserve of Uranium which we downgraded as "Waste" on the stock market.

Which we then sold at below cost to the Russians 50 years later.

So, BLM is the Anti-Nuclear of the 70s, with all the same reform rhetoric. Now we want Solar, and no buildings above 1 story. And no "sky-rises" as our limits have gone done a lot lower. And the future is neigh.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]lessalarming 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

To encapsulate the dropping of the ball on Thorium, once you have a thorium reactor that works for 50 years and a electricity distribution network that works for 100 years you then only pay with the time and education to operate the infrastructure to grow and make the infrastructure more efficient.

In the 100 to 200 years from using Thorium you get no nuclear grade fissile materials and you get to expand research into other inexhaustible fuels like fusion and microwave energy beamed from space.

There is essentially no cost other than time to needed to learn to operate the machinery and to maintain the system.

In the interim you can train more people and clean the ecosystem, etc.

This would be a selling point for the middle east to convert sea-water to potable drinking water. If a country become sustainable with China they will rise with China.

Neglecting Thorium will be seen as a Strategic attack of America. We'll be importing Thorium Reactors to America, as well as our latest Computer processors (CPU, GPUs), and 5G networks...

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]sproketboy 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I tend to forget to put /s. Clearly waste doesn't matter. The very little that there is is irrelevant. Here's another one: We should give the waste to terrorists. It would keep them occupied and they would end up just giving themselves thyroid cancer at most. Reason: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sLwqokQ7Gpk

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]forscher[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

See ? Now tell the truth Mr. Fantastic.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]forscher[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

See? But you never liked me anyways so how should i learn Astrodynamics from you ? Stop this course. Simple. It is. OR TEACH US. You gaping asshole. :)

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]forscher[S] 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Do i look like that? I TEACH physics. From a point of MATH. So thanks but NO THANKS. People either listen or they burn in space. Fuck them because there is no heroism there.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]forscher[S] 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

You all don't understand. But that is cool. I can live with that one. We got energy here. US-American Energy.

This sub is quite lively. Just post something wrong.

Thorium based Nuclear power by forscher in Physics

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

u/chop_chop won't dislike it I think