Women swear by ‘vabbing,’ vaginal fluid as ‘DIY perfume’: ‘You will attract people’

submitted by [deleted] from (nypost.com)

all 19 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[deleted]

    [–]jet199 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

    It's because men are now scared to talk to women so as usual women think they can solve the issues by buying more toiletries and clothes.

    [–]jagworms 2 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 4 fun -  (13 children)

    Pheromones. Science!!

    [–]jostiniane 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

    Last time I checked it said no such thing exists for humans

    [–]iamonlyoneman 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    They exist and are not well studied https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3987372/

    [–]jagworms 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    It would be kind of stupid to assert that humans are the only earth animal that does not have or use pheromones to communicate. We are and we do. Just because we don't realize we're being led around by our noses doesn't mean it isn't happening. It is.

    [–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    fr we even have the organ in our sinuses to detect 'em

    but, like tonsils and appendix, we don't know how they work so they're useless...until otherwise studies LOL

    [–]jagworms 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Actually, doctors are too stupid to know what they're for. The appendix is a gut biome storage chamber, and the tonsils are not useless.
    Doctors know nearly nothing about how the human body works. What they do know are all the drugs and how to sell them. Check this out: https://www.iflscience.com/researchers-accidentally-discover-what-could-be-an-entirely-new-organ-in-the-human-body-46824 https://nypost.com/2018/03/27/scientists-discover-new-organ-hiding-in-plain-sight/

    [–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    preaching to the choir, buddy

    [–]jostiniane 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Thanks for the guidance, I will check this out.

    Andrew Huberman had an episode about them and summarized the research studies done, the conclusion was that no good quality peer-reviewed study proved their effect/existence in humans

    [–]jagworms 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

    Consult a printed book. It's amazing what kind of baloney you'll find online.

    [–]jostiniane 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    Is a Harvard professor a baloney too? (Andrew Huberman)

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    Doesn't mean shit.
    Professors everywhere are pushing critical baloney theories.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

    "Experts", so to say, i agree.

    Most printed paper has the value of toilet-paper anyways. It is the mostly "imprinted" memories of many human beings that "gives" it a value "beyond" what it actually is.

    Because human beings don't trust each other "enough" anymore mostly, so to say.

    "Because you can trust the ticks that steer the banks" is a mainstream belief, e.g. .

    That is why they printed a "pseudo-solution" , a "proof-of-concept" - essentially most likely - on paper.

    Then they imprint the "pseudo-memory" that it "should have" more value than it actually has into the humans memory deeper, so to say, they give it to, even more than it already is.

    This is osmium-grade bullshit, if you want to listen to one of my "views" on this...

    That is why this traditional belief (that is a "quite obvious" fallacy anyways) is so hard to permantently shredder from a mean 80mb-hard-drive of a "standard" "Homer-Simpson"- pseudo-"brain" running Windows 3.1, so to say.

    Things like these are what my gods are joking about when they are talking about human beings again and again.

    [–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    You were hitting strong for a while, then were hit or miss. Glad to see you here hit it out of the park.

    [–]jagworms 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    I don't know what this guy thinks, but if he says humans don't use pheromones, he's wrong.

    Thanks for this fallacious appeal to authority. His tenure is meaningless.

    [–]Masterblaster 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    Wait till they hear about my cologne tip for men! (Hint: it’s cum)

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    It feels really nice that i seemingly am the only guy with a gal (that we know of so far) that actually understand how the relation between conciousness and subconciousness of a human being "relate" or "interact".

    It is fate that we met each other. I'm more and more sure of that. And my queen believes it anyways so there is nothing to see there, that could snap the deep bond we have. You possibly even can't find the pair of "scissors" that could divide us two. Because most likely it doesn't exist in this realm and time...

    Posts like these really make me proud of what i am.

    And we still both fuck around with "attractive" people, if we like to and don't object to each other. That is how deep our bond is. We don't need rings. We were made for each other.

    And then we see these rugrats pathetically experimenting with their vagene fluids... what a nice day today is...

    again.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    This is not new. Tom Robbins wrote about it decades ago (Even Cowgirls Get The Blues if I recall correctly). IMO, it works - depending on the individuals. It's called chemistry (hormones, pheromones, subjective tastes, etc).

    [–]SMCAB 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    I'm actually in favor of some regulation for this. All depends on the source I'm sure.

    If you're on the bus next to this, I don't think it will work