you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 8 fun8 insightful - 7 fun9 insightful - 8 fun -  (7 children)

Sending this to the wife.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (6 children)

0 + epsilon (small) = epsilon (small) .

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I have no idea what that means.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

"If you add an arbitrary small thing to zero it still is an arbitrary small thing."

It was a test-simulation of a joke, so to say.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Only people who have to think about approximations on a daily basis will understand your joke.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Students have to... That's why the sad faces. These idiots believe this stuff is boring.

Which it trivially isn't, of course.

[–]IridescentAnaconda 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Highly relevant for what I do for a living.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Highly relevant for me when i try to decide how to "fuzzy-define" the borders between my language(s), voices in my head, sensory input, mind castles and rl relation with humans.

If there isn't any convergence sensable "fast" enough it mostly makes not sense to follow through on the relation between a exemplary subsets of these things in my mind, so to say.