you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]StillLessons 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Getting inside the head of a person like her is impossible.

I am a super tolerant person, BUT

Tolerance must be balanced with responsibility and consequences. Yes, a person is a child of God, in all cases. But also yes, actions have consequences. She seemingly absolutely refuses to accept that the horrific actions she has been tasked with responding to require the most dire consequences in response. Leniency is not appropriate when it becomes an encouragement to the worst elements of human behavior. Encouragement is exactly the result of rulings like hers. She is profoundly not an appropriate judge of human nature to lead the concept of "justice" in our society.

This is not even to talk about the absolute disqualification she demonstrates through her refusal to acknowledge the biology of male and female that is literally the foundation of life itself, not to mention just human life.

This woman is a disaster.

[–]jet199 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

I read an article about people who have to look at child abuse images for police investigations and they said they thought the main reason for low sentencing was that judges purposely avoid looking at these images themselves.

If you see what she's been saying, how ignorant she is about the effort needed to collect these images, then that's very likely the case here.

[–]SeethingPeasant 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

They want her on the supreme court because they are all pedophiles. They have been trying to normalize pedophelia for years, the most recent attempt being "m.a.p.s.".

ALL PEDO'S SHOULD GET THE WOOD CHIPPER FEET FIRST.