you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Antarchomachus[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't want to fuck any children, you clearly don't know how to read

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Why would you defend the 'right' of paedophiles to fuck child replicas and watch child porn if you have no interest in these things yourself?

Let's say you aren't a paedo (obvious lie) you should still inform every adult you know that you are in favour of adults having child pornography and having sex with sex dolls that look like their children. That is your honest belief so you should tell everyone you know about it, for the safety for every child around you. Sick freak. There's a reason you will only say this on the internet and not to parents you know irl, you know every father would beat you to death on the spot if you told him this depravity.

[–]Antarchomachus[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Child porn I would not defend, real children are harmed in making that. People that abuse children should be in prison. I personally have no interest in a child sex doll, but if my neighbor wants to fuck a piece of plastic in the privacy of his own home, and doesn't hurt anyone while doing it, it's really not any of my business. My interest isn't in protecting the paedos, its from protecting individuals from people like you who would criminalize people that haven't hurt anyone, just because they go against your moral values. People like you are why we have had things like alcohol prohibition, censorship and the like. Society doesn't get to criminalize immorality, they get to criminalize harmful behavior where there is an actual victim

[–]Markimus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Child porn I would not defend, real children are harmed in making that. People that abuse children should be in prison.

"Terry Dunnett, 45, pleaded guilty Wednesday in District Court in Brisbane to two counts of possessing a child sex doll, one count of attempting to possess a child sex doll and possessing child exploitation material"

You are explicitly defending someone who was charged for child porn and child sex dolls right now.

I personally have no interest in a child sex doll, but if my neighbor wants to fuck a piece of plastic in the privacy of his own home, and doesn't hurt anyone while doing it, it's really not any of my business.

And you'd be happy for that doll to be based on the likeness of your own child too, since it doesn't harm anyone.

My interest isn't in protecting the paedos, its from protecting individuals from people like you who would criminalize people that haven't hurt anyone, just because they go against your moral values.

Yes, protecting paedos from normal people who have morals against predators and psychopaths like you who don't.

People like you are why we have had things like alcohol prohibition, censorship and the like.

We have none of those things because of people like you, that want to see humanity completely destroyed and depraved. All because you have no qualities of a man, all you do is consume and engage in hedonism like the worthless loser you are. Thus you want the whole world to be as worthless and disgusting as you. Paedo.

Society doesn't get to criminalize immorality, they get to criminalize harmful behavior where there is an actual victim

When we kick the jews out of power you liberals will be miserable as the world get happier and more healthy.


Again, go tell all your neighbours, friends, and family that you defend the right of paedophiles to have sex with dolls that look like their children and watch child porn because they aren't directly 'harming anyone'. See what happens you disgusting subhuman, liberal vermin.