Whoopi Goldberg ‘Shocked’ at Catching COVID Despite Being Triple Vaxxed

submitted by cottoneyejoe from summit.news

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FlippyKing 16 insightful - 5 fun16 insightful - 4 fun17 insightful - 5 fun -  (61 children)

Preemptively addressing the "but how much worse would her symptoms have been if she had not been triple-vaxxed" tact because it is silly and untestable. Severity of symptoms reported by patients is entirely subjective. Being told to get vaxxed and doing it THREE TIMES already indicates someone who will go along to get along. Such a person (assuming this is all not just scripted theater for the masses) is almost guaranteed to accept the notion that what ever their symptoms were that they would have been worse than had they not been jabbed three times in such a ridiculously short period of time.

[–]dingoatemytaco 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (60 children)

Preemptively addressing the "but how much worse would her symptoms have been if she had not been triple-vaxxed" tact

Excellent approach in this case

because it is silly and untestable.

Absolutely not - as she's not as severely affected, and we know this because of billions of jabs world-wide that have helped with the data about vaccines.

Severity of symptoms reported by patients is entirely subjective.

Not entirely. One can often see when people are visibly in pain and match that with what they're saying.

Being told to get vaxxed and doing it THREE TIMES already indicates someone who will go along to get along.

Not in the least. Everyone is advised to get each jab at least 90 days apart. It's not stupid to do so. It's stupid not to do so.

Such a person (assuming this is all not just scripted theater for the masses) is almost guaranteed to accept the notion that what ever their symptoms were that they would have been worse than had they not been jabbed three times in such a ridiculously short period of time.

That is indeed the science, rather than a notion.

(Sorry - I appreciate that I am the odd one here who doesn't conform to the anti-science narratives pushed by right-wing groups, as this anti-vax movement doesn't help anyone, other than a few filthy rich people who want COVID19 to continue to spread and make them richer.)

[–][deleted] 10 insightful - 5 fun10 insightful - 4 fun11 insightful - 5 fun -  (55 children)

socks? Is that you?

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (4 children)

I was thinking the same thing. And before too. /u/d3rr?

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 6 fun5 insightful - 5 fun6 insightful - 6 fun -  (3 children)

Probably. I'll smote that fucker again. It has happened before.

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 5 fun4 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

smote

Great word! I wanna make it an acronym for something.

[–]grassfed 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Yey socks finally perished, thanks to your hard work, I was always against him from the beginning but magnora never listened to me

[–]JasonCarswell 4 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Sadly he was only smote for 2 weeks this time. A bad decision IMO. He's back, for now.

[–][deleted]  (49 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (46 children)

    I thought you had been banned. Bummer.

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    He was but it was reduced to a temp ban instead. I'll take the blame, I don't want anyone here permanently banned.

    [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

    And who the fuck are you? A sort of shadow admin? Or just a pleb imposing his preferences onto the rest of us?

    [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    The latter.

    [–][deleted]  (42 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      Not at all, this looked like the kind of post you might make, so I asked if it's you, under the belief that your actual u/socks account had been banned. Total good faith here. ALWAYS.

      [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (40 children)

      I think you should leave that whole thing in the past.

      Dingo does have very similar views to you. I didn't have to argue for you, we would have had a replacement if I had just been more patient. ;)

      [–][deleted]  (33 children)

      [deleted]

        [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (32 children)

        Oh, they are your alts?

        [–][deleted] 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (12 children)

        See dude, no real consequences, no real changing. The punishment is losing your account and having to start all over. This 2 week thing did nothing.

        /u/AXXA

        [–][deleted]  (18 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted]  (5 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

            You should post it. I turned off the chat a while ago because I never saw anyone on there.

            [–]AXXA 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

            Happy Epiphany Day

            [–]goonmessiah 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

            What about the people who disagree and aren’t right wing or anti-science?

            [–]dingoatemytaco 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

            They're in denial.

            [–]goonmessiah 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

            I think you’re in denial about such professionals existing and potentially being right.

            [–]FlippyKing 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

            Not entirely. One can often see when people are visibly in pain and match that with what they're saying.

            Reported symptoms is what I was referring to, not the kind where the doctor or intern or reception nurse can write down or check off something like "patient was exhibiting difficulty in breathing" or something observable. In such instances the observed symptoms would supercede the ones reported by the patient because the latter are subjective.

            Not in the least. Everyone is advised to get each jab at least 90 days apart. It's not stupid to do so. It's stupid not to do so.

            You are swapping out my "go along to get along" for your insertion of "stupid". I'm not calling it stupid, I'm saying someone who has been all jabbed up goes along to get along. I'm not calling them stupid.

            That is indeed the science, rather than a notion.

            "the science" is not a thing. Science is a process, a method if inquiry. Perhaps the most important part of the process is the replication of results by repeating the process independently. Make all data available, describe the methods in detail. Once that happens, science can begin and people can review the data and see if the results are repeated. Science with regard to this has not really begun yet.

            Don't apologize for being an apologist for the dominant narrative on this. I won't apologize for seeing you for what you are.