Public Servant AOC Wears 'Tax the Rich' Dress to $30k Per Ticket Event

submitted by Chipit from youtu.be

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (11 children)

The real hard left move would have been to join the protesters outside the event. Or simply refuse to attend at all, and issue a statement condemning the pedophile billionaires in attendance. But she won't do that because she's a corrupt phony.

"social democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism"

[–]VirgilGriff 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (5 children)

She wouldn't do that because she's a woman and loves attention and status

FTFY

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]VirgilGriff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

    lol yes, AOC hates attention and hates status. Like 99% of women. They hate status and hate getting attention.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Completely irrelevant. She's done nothing wrong. Meanwhile, hundreds of other congresspeople who do nothing aren't getting this idiotic response about: ooooh - he LOVES attention - look at him....

    [–]VirgilGriff 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    She did nothing wrong? A socialist that attended an event for elites? Which costs $30k/ticket?

    A socialist who claimed that we should eat the rich. That it's wrong to have an elite class and a plebian class. Goes to an event for elites instead of joining the other poor people outside protesting the event.

    That's not wrong to you?

    Lick more boot.

    [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Bullshit

    All you say is "Bullshit". At least this one is short and honest.

    [–]Blackbrownfreestuff 3 insightful - 3 fun3 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

    But she won't do that because she's a corrupt phony.

    Exactly, but liberals are infatuated with her. The elites picked her for good reason. She has the liberal masses bamboozled.

    [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    So what? She made an important statement, in a room of rich people. We should tax the rich. Noting that she could have done something else is missing the point.

    [–]Chipit[S] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    What important statement? One that pretty much everyone agrees with?

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Mine as well not say it at all and believe Tucker Cuckson.

    [–]Jesus 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Mine as well not say it at all and believe Tucker Cuckoos.