you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iamonlyoneman 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not chasing through the maze of references in this paper, but the highlights from P23 are a rehash of "there's not much difference between the kinds of masks" which is a handwave-away of the question of "do masks actually help" which usually is answered 'yeah, some'. If you disagree then refer to Fig.2 of your link in comments: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994-f2 if you can't see the majority of results saying "masks help some" then IDK what to tell you.

If you don't think masks catch sputum, I have a bridge to sell you. They work for what they work for, and expecting things to perform outside design parameters is often silly.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The masks that are necessary to stop viruses are extreme. They only use them in special labs. There is a ISO standard that was known far before 2019. And still some people that work with them think that they are unnecessary.

Probably because our healthy immune system can handle them. Our airways have an immune system on their own, with special cells that capture viruses. This protection of this system is reduced when wearing a mask that restricts airflow.

The only problem are people with a weak airway immune system and those could be given such special masks. Problem solved.

Against SARS-Cov2 there were no masks necessary. The sun breaks it down quickly. It was very weak and can be treated very well with Ivermectin and HCQ links But because Bill Gates needed an emergency use for the clotshots, the corrupt agencies stepped in to block these medicine. Literally murdering people.