Free Covid Tests

submitted by zyxzevn from (media.communities.win)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

You're suggesting that you can't have COVID-19 until you have symptoms?

So neither believe in the fact that the virus has to build up to a certain level before your immune systems responds noticeably. Nor do you believe in asymptomatic carriers?

None of that sounds right.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Covid-19 are the disease with symptoms. Without symptoms you do not spread the disease due to low viral load, but you can spread the immunity.

The SARS-Cov2 virus can be everywhere, and you probably had it a several times. The immune system usually eats up any virus that tries to enter your body. Only under a heavy load it will bring in the big guns.

The symptoms are very similar to the flu and were mixed up a lot. The tests of Covid are really bad, with 95% to 100% false positives. Which makes most testing a waste of time anyway.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Covid-19 are the disease with symptoms.

Yeah, okay. Technically COVID-19 is the disease. But colloquially, you get a "COVID-19" test and people know what that means.

Without symptoms you do not spread the disease due to low viral load,

That's not true. There are many cases of asymptomatic people spreading the infection.

"Combined, these baseline assumptions imply that persons with infection who never develop symptoms may account for approximately 24% of all transmission." - https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2774707

but you can spread the immunity.

What?

The SARS-Cov2 virus can be everywhere, and you probably had it a several times.

I probably haven't.

The symptoms are very similar to the flu and were mixed up a lot.

Yes. For less serious cases.

The tests of Covid are really bad, with 95% to 100% false positives.

Nowhere near that high. PCR tests for SARS-Cov2 are most likely somewhere in the 0.8% to 4.0%, which is the interquartile range of the studies aggregated for this paper, looking at false postives in SARS-COV2 tests: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.04.26.20080911v1.full

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Actually knows this, is sealioning and timesucking while shilling.

IMO, you are wiser not wasting time on Actually or socks, unless it's for the benefit of the readers.

I came back to this post 2 days later because Dot-Win sites are censored on Facebook but SaidIt posts are good proxies.

[–]zyxzevn[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks. I will have a good look at the sealioning.
Indeed we really need not to put much energy/time into these people, because they lack intelligence.
I usually give a quick but clear respond to make a shilltroll spend a huge amount of effort into a reply.
So much that it can burn their brains. For a reply that may never be read..

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You have a good policy.