you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I have had this idea before as well too. I think it's accurate.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

My their is that this was a propaganda piece used against social organizing.

Mohawk Valley Formula propaganda.

Noam Chomsky has described the formula as the result of business owners' trend away from violent strikebreaking to a "scientific" approach based on propaganda. An essential feature of this approach is the identification of the management's interests with "Americanism," while labor activism is portrayed as the work of un-American outsiders. Workers are thus persuaded to turn against the activists and toward management to demonstrate their patriotism.

  • Don't antagonize the system.
  • The community is in harmony.
  • Everyone is paid enough, and your problems are your fault.
  • Do not discuss them, so you won't realize that the game is rigged against you. * Accept that you can do nothing about it.
  • Shut up. Get back to work.

I've never found confirmation of my theory, but I have a nagging feeling about this particular idea that can't explain. It fits the spirit of the Mohawk Valley propaganda form. It politely says, "shut up, and don't make waves".

I don't like it.

[–]Alduin 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Just to clarify, you think a statement encouraging people to hold civil discussion about controversial topics is really secretly telling those people to "shut up and don't make waves"?

Sorry, you're going to need more than a nagging feeling you can't explain to make that connection I think.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Alduin.

Once again you are confused, and have it completely backwards.