all 5 comments

[–]FormosaOolong 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It'd be nice if the article itself were not biased to only left-leaning sites. There are plenty of right-leaning bullshit sites too.

Very very tired of the fake two-party divide crap.

[–]Tiwaking 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

I'll never forget how Snopes marked an article as 'mostly false'.

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/dems-impeach-gop-presidents/

The Democratic party has tried to impeach every Republican president since Dwight D. Eisenhower.

MOSTLY FALSE

Articles of impeachment were introduced against five of the six Republican presidents who have served since President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

......

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I've figured snopes as completely random quite a few years ago. It's nice to see some confirmation as to why! :-)

[–]beermeem 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Snopes is such an amazing piece of bullshit. I recently saw another “mostly false” that was just laughable. I think it was one of their Benghazi entries. They use “mostly true” and “mostly false” to fudge anything and everything they want.

[–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 4 fun5 insightful - 3 fun6 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Fake + fake = true?

Two wrongs don't make a right?

I'm so confused!

Time for an expert authority to think for me...