Isn't the statement on this meme objectively sexist?
submitted 5 years ago by sawboss from (reddit.com)
view the rest of the comments →
[–]SpeakEasy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 5 years ago (0 children)
In the purest form of objectivity, sure. But then, in pure objectivity, I'd argue sexism doesn't exist, since it's a social construct.
It's making a generalization based off our society's residual stigma that most girls will/should become mothers. It also follows the trend of proclaiming that the actions of young people now will be the ones to foster the next generation, which is common for men as well. So, I don't believe it to be sexist, objectively or referentially. It's just one of those societal tropes that's persisted since time began. Go forth and have/don't have children!
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
sub:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~3 users here now
view the rest of the comments →
[–]SpeakEasy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)