Breast Mourning

submitted by Musky from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

That's not a denial. So ESG funds are dark money?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

FFS.

Dark money is money from people or organizations whose names are not known or revealed.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/dark-money

ESG funds are only dark money if the particular fund is not known or revealed.

If you have any further problems with the English language feel free to google it your fucking self.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Yes, deflect but not deny. Of course! And then end with another obligatory insult. Have you caught on yet, that this tactic is not working?

So how was that paper funded? Is it your paper, is it your graduation thesis? As to me it looks to brush anomalies under the rug to maintain the status quo. I'm certain someone appreciates this, regardless as to it's accuracy. And that's a clearly biased motivation.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Yes, deflect but not deny.

Deny What? So far your question is "So now ESG funds are dark money?". The answer is "If and only if it's from people or organizations whose names are not known or revealed."

Your inability to comprehend simple English is dragging this out. You're trying to avoid something? Were you beaten with a scholarly paper as a child?

So how was that paper funded?

The dinosaur one?

The question you're avoiding answering is "What is the outside influence on this paper?"

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

I can't answer that question as with most papers they do not disclose conflicts of interest.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So you have no basis for claiming that the is one?

... But you suspect that the big dinosaur skin is biassing the results by influencing the research by threatening funding unless the interpretation of the fossil meets their nefarious purposes?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

"""Dinosaur skin™..."""

Just stop.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Are you not even following the conversation?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

No. I'm not. You've turned it into a joke I'm afraid. Sorry!

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Mate, you've claimed every paper has outside influence biasing it.

You're comments are a joke long before I responded to them.