you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

I don't care if it's in the DSM 100, it's blatantly dishonest and distorted by liberal gender theory. You have to be an NPC to not recognize how the last two criteria are fundamentally different from the rest. Something like a girl not liking pink or dresses does not indicate transness, and to think it does is actually sexist. And kids are impressionable, so once adults or other kids plant that idea in their head they're going to believe it until they end up detransitioning. Then go on to blame trans people for fucking up their lives and propagating sexism. It also downplays the severity of gender dysphoria by equating it with normal struggles with conformity and peer pressure.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (14 children)

The definition of gender dysphoria is what it is. You can care or not, but the DSM V is the standard. And if you have all the others, you don't need the last two.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

Did you know? The meaning of words change all the time. In doing so retroactively changing older definitions creating paradoxes and falsehoods. This is how you subvert objective realities and observations, replacing them with lies meant to destroy nations and your family blood line.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Did you know? The meaning of words change all the time.

Technical terms are well defined.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You live in a false reality.

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

When I use the term "gender dysphoria" I mean the diagnosis described in the current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders.

It's well defined. It's definitely not false.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And when you say "flu". You have no idea what you are actually saying as the word has lost it's original meaning. Well, assuming you to be arguing in good faith that is.

It's origin is the Latin phrase "Influenza Delle Stelle", which implies radiation from solar winds cause radiation sickness. May I remind you, words are only tools, and all tools can be used for good or bad.

Changing the definition of "vaccines". Changing the definition of "white". Changing the definition of "woman". Do you honestly wish for me to believe you do not see this transparent ruses?

Question! What is black sunshine?

[–]ActuallyNot 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

And when you say "flu". You have no idea what you are actually saying as the word has lost it's original meaning.

When i say it i mean influenza. And it's fairly well defined.

What was the original meaning?

Do you honestly wish for me to believe you do not see this transparent ruses?

I don't think I've given any thought to what i would like you to believe about that. But i have no idea what these "ruses" are.

Black sunshine's a car isn't it?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

All words in the world are defined by other words. When you change the definition of any single word, it has a knock on effect that subtly changes the definition of all words in existence. The less change that takes place over time, the easier it is to pass a lie as a truth. Which is why the lies are so transparent now during this time in history.

As any child will tell you, the easiest way to lie is to hide it in a partial truth. Legal definitions become abstraction layers used to conceal crimes, and cognitive dissonance turns to angst. You don't know what's wrong, but you know something is. You have been deceived.

Regarding Black Sunshine. If I told you at this time, you would lash out at me in disbelief.

[–]ActuallyNot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Deep man.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So you do Neo

[–]Vulptex 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Okay I agree with everything you said, but I don't see what the big deal is about the family blood line. It comes up a lot so I'm curious.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Your heritage and your way of life depends on you continuing your family line. How your children help craft humanity is vital to our existence. That is all.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How so? You obviously know your own kids, you'll probably meet your grandkids and great grandkids, but that's it. What happens after that is of no relevance to you, and you can't predict or control what your descendents will do. What about people who don't have kids at all? Do they not have lives?

I actually think it's not such a bright idea to drag another innocent life into this world. I don't believe in any form of coercion so extinguishing existing life is out of the question, including the unborn. But creating new flesh in the first place isn't as ethical as it seems. I don't expect you to understand any of this though. I've reached a point where I know more about the world than the human mind was meant to handle. And it's not a place you want to be.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You seem to be arguing that life and existence hold no meaning, and are inherently without merit. If you believe this to be a self evident truth, then we have nothing to say to each other at this time.

[–]Vulptex 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You need the last two and I'm not bowing down to the DSM 5 when it's wrong. Who gave them the right to call all the shots?

They want to erase transsexuals so that they can normalize transgenderism, and that's because it's politically expedient in the culture war era and brings in truckloads of cash to big pharma and Planned Parenthood. This isn't something to celebrate about. I hope it dwindles away and dies and never bothers anyone ever again.

Two of the criteria are people having real distress about their bodies. The rest are essentially what they do in Iran: "We're gonna make you trans because we're raging sexists and hate people who don't fit gender norms". WHAT THE FUCK?!!! No wonder there's TERFs. No wonder detransitioning is on the rise.

If this goes far enough EVERYONE will be considered "gender fluid". Then they will have successfully erased both super straights and transsexuals. And gotten everyone to believe such obvious bullshit purely through social engineering, and it is merely an experiment for communist subverters. They'll know they've won when everything the people believe is a lie. Seriously, people who lived under communism are warning that this radical leftist agenda IS communism, whether they admit it or not. And it is. They just want to destroy the individual so they can have all the power to themselves. A metaphorical matrix within a literal matrix, imagine that. Of course I already consider it such.